ArticleMethods of information in medicine2022
Disambiguating Clinical Abbreviations Using a One-Fits-All Classifier Based on Deep Learning Techniques.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- End-to-end pipeline for automated heart failure diagnosis with clinical notes using SNOMED-CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical entity augmented retrieval for clinical information extraction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging pre-trained embeddings in an ensemble machine learning approach for Arabic sentiment analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Deciphering Abbreviations in Malaysian Clinical Notes Using Machine Learning.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Processing of Short-Form Content in Clinical Narratives: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Clinical Abbreviation Disambiguation.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- O2 supplementation disambiguation in clinical narratives to support retrospective COVID-19 studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Clinical Note Structural Knowledge Improves Word Sense Disambiguation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024Article
- Sequence Labeling for Disambiguating Medical Abbreviations.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Deciphering clinical abbreviations with a privacy protecting machine learning system.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbbreviations are considered an essential part of the clinical narrative; they are used not only to save time and space but also to hide serious or incurable illnesses. Misreckoning interpretation of the clinical abbreviations could affect different aspects concerning patients themselves or other services like clinical support systems. There is no consensus in the scientific community to create new abbreviations, making it difficult to understand them. Disambiguate clinical abbreviations aim to predict the exact meaning of the abbreviation based on context, a crucial step in understanding clinical notes.
objectivesDisambiguating clinical abbreviations is an essential task in information extraction from medical texts. Deep contextualized representations models showed promising results in most word sense disambiguation tasks. In this work, we propose a one-fits-all classifier to disambiguate clinical abbreviations with deep contextualized representation from pretrained language models like Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT).
methodsA set of experiments with different pretrained clinical BERT models were performed to investigate fine-tuning methods on the disambiguation of clinical abbreviations. One-fits-all classifiers were used to improve disambiguating rare clinical abbreviations.
resultsOne-fits-all classifiers with deep contextualized representations from Bioclinical, BlueBERT, and MS_BERT pretrained models improved the accuracy using the University of Minnesota data set. The model achieved 98.99, 98.75, and 99.13%, respectively. All the models outperform the state-of-the-art in the previous work of around 98.39%, with the best accuracy using the MS_BERT model.
conclusionDeep contextualized representations via fine-tuning of pretrained language modeling proved its sufficiency on disambiguating clinical abbreviations; it could be robust for rare and unseen abbreviations and has the advantage of avoiding building a separate classifier for each abbreviation. Transfer learning can improve the development of practical abbreviation disambiguation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.