Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35104883›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2022

Mine or ours? Neural basis of the exploitation of common-pool resources.

Mario Martinez-Saito, Sandra Andraszewicz, Vasily Klucharev, Jörg Rieskamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario Martinez-SaitoInternational Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Russian Federation, Moscow 101000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6794-336X
Sandra AndraszewiczDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8006, Swiss Confederation.
Vasily KlucharevInternational Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Russian Federation, Moscow 101000, Russia.
Jörg RieskampDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel 4055, Swiss Confederation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why do people often exhaust unregulated common (shared) natural resources but manage to preserve similar private resources? To answer this question, in this study we combine a neurobiological, economic and cognitive modeling approach. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging on 50 participants, we show that a sharp decrease of common and private resources is associated with deactivation of the ventral striatum, a brain region involved in the valuation of outcomes. Across individuals, when facing a common resource, ventral striatal activity is anticorrelated with resource preservation (less harvesting), whereas with private resources the opposite pattern is observed. This indicates that neural value signals distinctly modulate behavior in response to the depletion of common vs private resources. Computational modeling suggested that overharvesting of common resources was facilitated by the modulatory effect of social comparison on value signals. These results provide an explanation of people's tendency to over-exploit unregulated common natural resources.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingVentral StriatumBrainComputer SimulationHumanscommon goodsreinforcement learningsocial comparisonsocial competitiontragedy of the commonsventral striatum

Identifiers

PMID35104883
PMCPMC9433840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.