ArticleEcotoxicology and environmental safety2022
Modelling the effects of variability in feeding rate on growth - a vital step for DEB-TKTD modelling.
Article in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major limitation of dietary toxicity studies on rodents is that food consumption often differs between treatments. The control treatment serves as a reference of how animals would have grown if not for the toxicant in their diet, but this comparison unavoidably conflates the effects of toxicity and feeding rate on body weight over time. A key advantage of toxicity models based on dynamic energy budget theory (DEB) is that chemical stress and food consumption are separate model inputs, so their effects on growth rate can be separated. To reduce data requirements, DEB convention is to derive a simplified feeding input, f, from food availability; its value ranges from zero (starvation) to one (food available ad libitum). Observed food consumption in dietary toxicity studies shows that, even in the control treatment, rats limit their food consumption, contradicting DEB assumptions regarding feeding rate. Relatively little work has focused on addressing this mismatch, but accurately modelling the effects of food intake on growth rate is essential for the effects of toxicity to be isolated. This can provide greater insight into the results of chronic toxicity studies and allows accurate extrapolation of toxic effects from laboratory data. Here we trial a new method for calculating f, based on the observed relationships between food consumption and body size in laboratory rats. We compare model results with those of the conventional DEB method and a previous effort to calculate f using observed food consumption data. Our results showed that the new method improved model accuracy while modelled reserve dynamics closely followed observed body fat percentage over time. The new method assumes that digestive efficiency increases with body size
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.