Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35104320›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

SPOT-Contact-LM: improving single-sequence-based prediction of protein contact map using a transformer language model.

Jaspreet Singh, Thomas Litfin, Jaswinder Singh, Kuldip Paliwal, Yaoqi Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application of Transformers in Cheminformatics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep learning for protein secondary structure prediction: Pre and post-AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jaspreet SinghSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-5188
Thomas LitfinSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
Jaswinder SinghSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-5533
Kuldip PaliwalSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
Yaoqi ZhouInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-5699
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAccurate prediction of protein contact-map is essential for accurate protein structure and function prediction. As a result, many methods have been developed for protein contact map prediction. However, most methods rely on protein-sequence-evolutionary information, which may not exist for many proteins due to lack of naturally occurring homologous sequences. Moreover, generating evolutionary profiles is computationally intensive. Here, we developed a contact-map predictor utilizing the output of a pre-trained language model ESM-1b as an input along with a large training set and an ensemble of residual neural networks.

resultsWe showed that the proposed method makes a significant improvement over a single-sequence-based predictor SSCpred with 15% improvement in the F1-score for the independent CASP14-FM test set. It also outperforms evolutionary-profile-based methods trRosetta and SPOT-Contact with 48.7% and 48.5% respective improvement in the F1-score on the proteins without homologs (Neff = 1) in the independent SPOT-2018 set. The new method provides a much faster and reasonably accurate alternative to evolution-based methods, useful for large-scale prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Stand-alone-version of SPOT-Contact-LM is available at https://github.com/jas-preet/SPOT-Contact-Single. Direct prediction can also be made at https://sparks-lab.org/server/spot-contact-single. The datasets used in this research can also be downloaded from the GitHub. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyLanguageAmino Acid SequenceNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35104320
PMCPMC9113311
OpenAlexW4210535996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.