Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35104279›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2022

Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Anadeijda J E M C Landman, Marjon A de Boer, Laura Visser, Tobias A J Nijman, Marieke A C Hemels, Christiana N Naaktgeboren, Marijke C van der Weide, Ben W Mol, Judith O E H van Laar, Dimitri N M Papatsonis and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-term child outcomes after prenatal aspirin exposure: A 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (the APRIL study).International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  4. Cost-effectiveness of a randomized controlled trial comparing low-dose aspirin to placebo for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Trial
  5. Evaluation of the Effect of Low-dose Aspirin on the Prevention of Preterm Delivery in Women with a History of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Single-cell-level digital twins for preterm birth prevention strategies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A historical narrative review through the field of tocolysis in threatened preterm birth.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Preterm Birth Therapies to Target Inflammation.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.

Anadeijda J E M C LandmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6354-3489
Marjon A de BoerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura VisserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tobias A J NijmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Marieke A C HemelsDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Christiana N NaaktgeborenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-9989
Marijke C van der WeideDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6979-1347
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-550X
Judith O E H van LaarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Dimitri N M PapatsonisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Mireille N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-4291
Joris van DrongelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-4288
Mariëlle G van PampusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marieke SuetersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
David P van der HamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-2477
J Marko SikkemaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Almelo, the Netherlands.
Joost J ZwartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Anjoke J M HuisjesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Marloes E van HuizenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Gunilla KleiverdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevo Hospital Almere, Almere, the Netherlands.
Janine BoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maureen T M FranssenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wietske HermesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Harry VisserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-4550
Christianne J M de GrootDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLGelre Hospitals · NLHaga Hospital · NLIsala · NLLeiden University · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLOLVG · NLTergooi · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND

findingsWe performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates.

conclusionsIn this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553.

Indexed as

AdultAspirinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansNetherlandsObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancyPremature BirthAspirin

Identifiers

PMID35104279
PMCPMC8806064
OpenAlexW4210357641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.