Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35104027›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022

Exploring microbiome engineering as a strategy for improved thermal tolerance in Exaiptasia diaphana.

Ashley M Dungan, Leon M Hartman, Linda L Blackall, Madeleine J H van Oppen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Long-Term Heat Selection of the Coral EndosymbiontInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley M DunganSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-2177
Leon M HartmanSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-1334
Linda L BlackallSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-7698
Madeleine J H van OppenSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-0744
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Institute of Marine Science · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP160101468Australian Research Council FL180100036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFourteen percent of all living coral, equivalent to more than all the coral on the Great Barrier Reef, has died in the past decade as a result of climate change-driven bleaching. Inspired by the 'oxidative stress theory of coral bleaching', we investigated whether a bacterial consortium designed to scavenge free radicals could integrate into the host microbiome and improve thermal tolerance of the coral model, Exaiptasia diaphana. METHODS AND

resultsE. diaphana anemones were inoculated with a consortium of high free radical scavenging (FRS) bacteria, a consortium of congeneric low FRS bacteria, or sterile seawater as a control, then exposed to elevated temperature. Increases in the relative abundance of Labrenzia during the first 2 weeks following the last inoculation provided evidence for temporary inoculum integration into the E. diaphana microbiome. Initial uptake of other consortium members was inconsistent, and these bacteria did not persist either in E. diaphana's microbiome over time. Given their non-integration into the host microbiome, the ability of the FRS consortium to mitigate thermal stress could not be assessed. Importantly, there were no physiological impacts (negative or positive) of the bacterial inoculations on the holobiont.

conclusionsThe introduced bacteria were not maintained in the anemone microbiome over time, thus, their protective effect is unknown. Achieving long-term integration of bacteria into cnidarian microbiomes remains a research priority. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Microbiome engineering strategies to mitigate coral bleaching may assist coral reefs in their persistence until climate change has been curbed. This study provides insights that will inform microbiome manipulation approaches in coral bleaching mitigation research.

Indexed as

AnthozoaMicrobiotaRhodobacteraceaeAnimalsCoral ReefsSeawaterassisted evolutioncoral bleachingExaiptasia diaphanamicrobiome engineeringmicrobiome manipulationROS

Identifiers

PMID35104027
PMCPMC9303619
OpenAlexW4210703580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.