Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103966›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Epi-Decoder: Decoding the Local Proteome of a Genomic Locus by Massive Parallel Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Combined with DNA-Barcode Sequencing.

Maria Elize van Breugel, Fred van Leeuwen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Elize van BreugelDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fred van LeeuwenDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. fred.v.leeuwen@nki.nl.
Oncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome in a eukaryotic cell is packaged into chromatin and regulated by chromatin-binding and chromatin-modifying factors. Many of these factors and their complexes have been identified before, but how each genomic locus interacts with its surrounding proteins in the nucleus over time and in changing conditions remains poorly described. Measuring protein-DNA interactions at a specific locus in the genome is challenging and current techniques such as capture of a locus followed by mass spectrometry require high levels of enrichment. Epi-Decoder, a method developed in budding yeast, enables systematic decoding of the proteome of a single genomic locus of interest without the need for locus enrichment. Instead, Epi-Decoder uses massive parallel chromatin immunoprecipitation of tagged proteins combined with barcoding a genomic locus and counting of coimmunoprecipitated barcodes by DNA sequencing (TAG-ChIP-Barcode-Seq). In this scenario, DNA barcode counts serve as a quantitative readout for protein binding of each tagged protein to the barcoded locus. Epi-Decoder can be applied to determine the protein-DNA interactions at a wide range of genomic loci, such as coding genes, noncoding genes, and intergenic regions. Furthermore, Epi-Decoder provides the option to study protein-DNA interactions upon changing cellular and/or genetic conditions. In this protocol, we describe in detail how to construct Epi-Decoder libraries and how to perform an Epi-Decoder analysis.

Indexed as

ChromatinProteomeChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNAGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAChromatinDNAProteomeChIPChromatinDNA barcodesEpi-DecoderProteome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.