Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103890›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Impact of Quilting Sutures on Surgical Outcomes After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Stefan Morarasu, Cillian Clancy, Nicolae Ghetu, Ana Maria Musina, Natalia Velenciuc, Stefan Iacob, Tudor Frunza, Cristian Ene Roata, Sorinel Lunca, Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Small-bites versus large-bites closure of midline laparotomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan Morarasu2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Cillian ClancyDepartment of Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. clancyci@tcd.ie.
Nicolae Ghetu2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Ana Maria Musina2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Natalia Velenciuc2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Stefan Iacob2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Tudor Frunza2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Cristian Ene Roata2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Sorinel Lunca2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Institutul Regional de Oncologie · ROSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeroma after mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is among the most common issue surgeons have to face in the early postoperative management of breast cancer. Using quilting sutures (QS) to aid in tissue approximation and decrease dead space is proposed as a simple technique to reduce seroma rate. We aimed to perform a systematic review, and analyse, in a meta-analytical model, the role of QS in improving wound outcomes and decrease volume, duration of drainage, and length of stay in hospital.

methodsThe study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was performed for all comparative studies examining surgical outcomes in patients who underwent QS versus conventional closure (CC) after mastectomy ± ALND.

resultsTwenty-one studies with a total of 3473 patients (1736 in the study group and 1737 in the control group) were included based on the selection criteria. The study group showed significantly lower rates of seroma (p < 0.00001), total volume of drainage (p < 0.0001), days to drain removal (p < 0.00001), and length of stay (p < 0.00001) compared with the control group, while wound complication rates (surgical site infection, flap necrosis, hematoma, skin dimpling) were comparable between the two groups.

conclusionsQS are a reliable intraoperative technique that decrease seroma formation, volume of postoperative drainage, duration of drainage and length of hospital stay, and should be considered in mastectomies with or without ALND.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomyDrainageFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSeromaSurgical FlapsSuturesSuture TechniquesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35103890
OpenAlexW4210461293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.