Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103865›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2022

'You're setting a lot of people up for failure': what formerly incarcerated women would tell healthcare decision makers.

Whitney K Norris, M Kathryn Allison, Marley F Fradley, Melissa J Zielinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Former Incarceration, Time Served, and Perceived Oral Health among African American Women and Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Whitney K NorrisUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
M Kathryn AllisonUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Marley F FradleyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Melissa J ZielinskiUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. MJZielinski@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-110X
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
The Lifespan/Brown Criminal Justice Research Program on Substance Use and HIVR25DA037190 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
Leveraging Implementation Science to Increase Access to Trauma Treatment for Incarcerated Drug UsersK23DA048162 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ZIELINSKI, MELISSA JEAN · 2019 to 2023
$811k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA048162NIDA NIH HHS K23DA048162NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037190NIDA NIH HHS R25DA037190NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022981NIDA NIH HHS T32DA022981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncarcerated women have a higher prevalence of health problems than the general population; however, little is known about their perspectives on the healthcare they receive. Here, we conducted semi-structured interviews with women who had been incarcerated (n = 63) which asked what they would tell healthcare decision-makers about their experiences of healthcare in prisons and the community post-incarceration if provided the opportunity. All participants had a history of sexual violence victimization and had at least one period of incarceration in a community corrections center in Arkansas due to the goals of the larger study from which data were drawn.

resultsFour themes arose when participants were asked what they would tell people who make decisions about community healthcare: 1) the healthcare system is not working (52%; n = 33), 2) have compassion for us (27%; n = 17), 3) recognize that we have specific and unique needs (17%; n = 11), and 4) the transition from incarceration is challenging and requires more support (22%; n = 14). Three themes arose when we asked participants what they would tell people who make decisions about healthcare in prisons: 1) we had experiences of poor physical healthcare in prison (44%; n = 28), 2) more specialty care is needed in prison (49%; n = 31), and 3) healthcare providers treat women in prison poorly (37%; n = 23).

conclusionsOur findings underscore the need for systemic changes including greater oversight of prison-based healthcare services, enhanced access to medical subspecialties in prisons, and healthcare provider training on the unique needs of incarcerated and previously incarcerated women. Polices that expand healthcare access are also likely to benefit formerly incarcerated women given the challenges they experience seeking community-based care.

Indexed as

Criminal justice systemHealth carePrisonReentryWomen

Identifiers

PMID35103865
PMCPMC8808972
OpenAlexW4210752106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.