Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103828›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2022

Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography-a prospective multicenter observational study.

Yining Wang, Yu Chen, Peijun Liu, Wan Lv, Jianlin Wu, Mengqi Wei, Dapeng Shi, Xianheng Wu, Wenya Liu, Xiaofeng Tao and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02840903 (A Study of the Image Quality in Coronary or Craniocervical CT Angiography With Different Iodine Delivery Rates Using Low Tube Voltage), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02840903 completednot on this map

A Study of the Image Quality in Coronary or Craniocervical CT Angiography With Different Iodine Delivery Rates Using Low Tube Voltage (80 or 100 kV) Imaging in MDCT

TypeobservationalSponsorBayerRan2016 to 2017Enrolled1,214ConditionsAngiography, Multidetector Computed TomographyArmsIopromide (Ultravist, BAY86-4877)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yining WangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yu ChenPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Peijun LiuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wan LvThe First People's Hospital of Yulin, # 495, JiaoYu Central Road, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Jianlin WuAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, # 6, Jiefang Road Zhongshan District, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Mengqi WeiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, # 15 Changle West Road, Xian, 710032, Shanxi, China.
Dapeng ShiHenan Provincial People's Hospital, # 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan, China.
Xianheng WuThe Second People's Hospital of Shantou, # 28, Waimalu Road, Shantou, 515031, Guangdong, China.
Wenya LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, # 137, Liyushan South Road, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Xiaofeng TaoShanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, # 639, Zaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Hongjie HuSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 Qinchun East Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China.
Xiangxing MaQilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), North District, # 758, Hefei Road, Qingdao, 266035, Shandong, China.
Xiaozheng YangMedical Affairs, Bayer Healthcare Co. Ltd, Dongshanhuan Central Road, Beijing, 100010, China.
Huadan XuePeking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhengyu JinPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District, Beijing, 100730, China. jinzy@pumch.cn.

Funding

Bayer This study was sponsored by Bayer as a phase IV study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDecreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice.

methodsA prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose.

resultsFrom July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44-52% radiation dose reductions (p < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions (p < 0.001).

conclusionEighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality. KEY POINTS: • Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice. • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyIodineContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyHumansProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaIodineComputed tomography angiographyContrast mediaRadiation dosageSignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.