Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103791›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Cost-effectiveness of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Short-Course Radiotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Re-I Chin, Ebunoluwa E Otegbeye, Kylie H Kang, Su-Hsin Chang, Scott McHenry, Amit Roy, William C Chapman, Lauren E Henke, Shahed N Badiyan, Katrina Pedersen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Re-I ChinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Ebunoluwa E OtegbeyeDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Kylie H KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Su-Hsin ChangDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Scott McHenryDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Amit RoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
William C ChapmanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Lauren E HenkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Shahed N BadiyanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Katrina PedersenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Benjamin R TanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Sean C GlasgowSection of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Matthew G MutchSection of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Pamela P SamsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Hyun KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009621 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN, William E. Gillanders · 1988 to 2026
$12.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Short-course radiotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy (SCRT-TNT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) has emerged as a new treatment paradigm for patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. However, the economic implication of this treatment strategy has not been compared with that of conventional long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) followed by TME with adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of SCRT-TNT vs LCCRT in conjunction with TME for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision analytical model with a 5-year time horizon was constructed for patients with biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed, primary locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma treated with SCRT-TNT or LCCRT. Markov modeling was used to model disease progression and patient survival after treatment in 3-month cycles. Data on probabilities and utilities were extracted from the literature. Costs were evaluated from the Medicare payer's perspective in 2020 US dollars. Sensitivity analyses were performed for key variables. Data were collected from October 3, 2020, to January 20, 2021, and analyzed from November 15, 2020, to April 25, 2021. Exposures: Two treatment strategies, SCRT-TNT vs LCCRT with adjuvant chemotherapy, were compared. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefits. Effectiveness was defined as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $50 000/QALY. Results: During the 5-year horizon, the total cost was $41 355 and QALYs were 2.21 for SCRT-TNT; for LCCRT, the total cost was $54 827 and QALYs were 2.12, resulting in a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (-$141 256.77). The net monetary benefit was $69 300 for SCRT-TNT and $51 060 for LCCRT. Sensitivity analyses using willingness to pay at $100 000/QALY and $150 000/QALY demonstrated the same conclusion. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that SCRT-TNT followed by TME incurs lower cost and improved QALYs compared with conventional LCCRT followed by TME and adjuvant chemotherapy. These data offer further rationale to support SCRT-TNT as a novel cost-saving treatment paradigm in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyMissouriNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35103791
PMCPMC8808328
OpenAlexW4210511953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.