Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103790›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Evaluation of Adiposity and Cognitive Function in Adults.

Sonia S Anand, Matthias G Friedrich, Douglas S Lee, Phillip Awadalla, J P Després, Dipika Desai, Russell J de Souza, Trevor Dummer, Grace Parraga, Eric Larose and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Brain effect of bariatric surgery in people with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Resting-state brain dynamics are associated with body fat percentage and sympathetic outflow in healthy adults.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonia S AnandPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Matthias G FriedrichDepartment of Cardiology and Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Douglas S LeeProgramming and Biostatistics, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Phillip AwadallaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J P DesprésDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Dipika DesaiPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Russell J de SouzaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Trevor DummerDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Grace ParragaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Eric LaroseDepartment of Medicine, University of Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Scott A LearFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Koon K TeoPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Paul PoirierFaculté de Pharmacie, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Karleen M SchulzePopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dorota SzczesniakDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Jean-Claude TardifMontreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jennifer VenaCancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Katarzyna ZatonskaDepartment of Social Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Canadian Alliance of Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) and the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) Study Investigators
Population Health Research Institute · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWroclaw Medical University · PLAlberta Health Services · CABC Cancer Agency · CAImpact · CAInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec · CAMcGill University · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR FDN-143255CIHR FDN-143313CIHR FDN-154317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Excess adipose tissue increases other cardiovascular risk factors, which may be associated with vascular brain injury and cognitive impairment. However, the extent to which the amount and distribution of adipose tissue may be associated with lower cognitive scores, independent of its association with cardiovascular risk factors, is not well characterized. Objective: To investigate the association of adiposity on vascular brain injury and cognitive scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 9189 participants from the Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) and the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological-Mind (PURE-MIND) cohort studies were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Of these adults, 9166 underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess body fat (BF) percentage, and 6773 underwent magnetic resonance imaging to assess vascular brain injury and measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume. Participants from CAHHM were recruited from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, and PURE-MIND participants were recruited from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. Both CAHHM and PURE-MIND comprise multisite, population-based cohorts. Participants from CAHHM are from Canada, and PURE-MIND participants are from Canada or Poland. Data analysis was performed from May 3 to November 24, 2021. Exposures: The percentage of BF and VAT were modeled as sex-specific quartiles. Vascular brain injury was defined as high white matter hyperintensities or silent brain infarction. Multivariable mixed models were used to examine factors associated with reduced cognitive scores. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was assessed using the Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST; scores range from 0 to 133, with lower scores indicating lower cognitive function) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (scores range from 0 to 30, with a score of ≥26 denoting normal cognitive function). Reduced cognition was defined as a DSST score less than 1 SD below the mean. Cardiovascular risk was assessed using the INTERHEART Risk Score (IHRS; scores range from 0 to 48; low risk is defined as a score of 0 to 9, moderate risk as 10 to 16, and high risk as 17 or higher). Results: A total of 9189 adults (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [8.8] years; 5179 [56.4%] women; and 1013 [11.0%] East and Southeast Asian; 295 [3.2%] South Asian; 7702 [83.8%] White European; and 179 [1.9%] other, including Black, Indigenous, mixed, and unknown ethnicity) participated in the study. Visceral adipose tissue was highly correlated with body adiposity measured by BF percentage (r = 0.76 in women; r = 0.70 in men). Cardiovascular risk factors increased with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile IHRS at 13.8 (95% CI, 13.5-14.0; P < .001 for trend) and with VAT with the fourth quartile IHRS at 13.3 (95% CI, 13.0-13.5; P < .001 for trend). Vascular brain injury increased with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile value at 8.6% (95% CI, 7.5%-9.8%; P = .007 for trend) and with increasing VAT with fourth quartile value at 7.2% (95% CI, 6.0-8.4; P = .05 for trend). Cognitive scores were lower with increasing BF percentage with the fourth quartile score of 70.9 (95% CI, 70.4-71.5; P < .001 for trend) and for VAT with the fourth quartile score of 72.8 (95% CI, 72.1-73.4; P < .001 for trend). For every 1-SD increase in BF percentage (9.2%) or VAT (36 mL), the DSST score was lower by 0.8 points (95% CI, 0.4-1.1; P < .001) for BF percentage and lower by 0.8 points (95% CI, 0.4-1.2; P < .001) for VAT, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and vascular brain injury. The population attributable risk for reduced DSST score for higher BF percentage was 20.5% (95% CI, 7.0%-33.2%) and for VAT was 19.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-36.0%). Higher BF percentage and VAT were not associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, generalized and visceral adiposity were associated with reduced cognitive scores, after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, educational level, and vascular brain injury. These results suggest that strategies to prevent or reduce adiposity may preserve cognitive function.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCanadaCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPolandProspective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID35103790
PMCPMC8808326
OpenAlexW4210324959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.