ArticleJournal of vision2022
Ideal observer analysis for continuous tracking experiments.
Article in Journal of vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous tracking of audiovisual motion.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Revealing temporal dynamics of the visuomotor system via continuous tracking of position and attribute.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Measuring spatial and temporal properties of visual crowding using continuous psychophysics.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- A comparative analysis of perceptual noise in lateral and depth motion: Evidence from eye tracking.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Context-dependence of deterministic and nondeterministic contributions to closed-loop steering control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Visual Tracking in Amblyopia: A Continuous Psychophysical Approach.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Investigating cross-orientation inhibition with continuous tracking.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Precision and temporal dynamics in heading perception assessed by continuous psychophysics.PloS one · 2024Article
- The dynamics of grouping-induced biases in apparent numerosity revealed by a continuous tracking technique.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Continuous psychophysics for two-variable experiments; A new "Bayesian participant" approach.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous tracking is a newly developed technique that allows fast and efficient data acquisition by asking participants to "track" a stimulus varying in some property (usually position in space). Tracking is a promising paradigm for the investigation of dynamic features of perception and could be particularly well suited for testing ecologically relevant situations difficult to study with classical psychophysical paradigms. The high rate of data collection may be useful in studies on clinical populations and children, who are unable to undergo long testing sessions. In this study, we designed tracking experiments with two novel stimulus features, numerosity and size, proving the feasibility of the technique outside standard object tracking. We went on to develop an ideal observer model that characterizes the results in terms of efficiency of conversion of stimulus strength into responses, and identification of early and late noise sources. Our ideal observer closely modeled results from human participants, providing a generalized framework for the interpretation of tracking data. The proposed model allows to use the tracking paradigm in various perceptual domains, and to study the divergence of human participants from ideal behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.