Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103579›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Analysis of vaccine messages on social media (Twitter) in Scandinavia.

H Fues Wahl, B Wikman Erlandson, C Sahlin, M Nyaku, G Benĉina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H Fues WahlQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3790-8445
B Wikman ErlandsonMSD, Stockholm, Sweden.
C SahlinQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
M NyakuMerck & CO., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
G BenĉinaCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence, MSD, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-8211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is listed as one of the top 10 global health threats by the WHO. Existing studies investigating the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and social media have found that misinformation and vaccine concerns on social media can cause significant declines in vaccine coverage rates. The objective of this study was to provide insight into the dynamics of vaccine messages on Twitter in Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), by analyzing tweets in local languages during 2019. A validated measure, the 5C scale, was used to map relevant predictors of vaccination behavior, capturing the factors

Indexed as

Papillomavirus VaccinesSocial MediaCommunicationHumansPublic HealthVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines5C modelmedicine and mediasentiment analysisSocial mediaTwittervaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35103579
PMCPMC8993101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.