Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103578›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Using an extended protection motivation theory to explain vaccine hesitancy: a cross-sectional study among Chinese adults.

Minqi Liu, Tingting Cui, Qiang Wang, Ying Han, Yue Han, Liuqing Yang, Naiyang Shi, Youqin Yi, Hui Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Minqi LiuKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Tingting CuiKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Qiang WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Ying HanKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Yue HanKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Liuqing YangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Naiyang ShiKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Youqin YiKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Hui JinKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.
Ministry of Education · CLSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy was listed as one of the top 10 issues threatening global health in 2019. The objectives of this study were to (a) use an extended protection motivation theory (PMT) with an added trust component to identify predictors of vaccine hesitancy and (b) explore the predictive ability of vaccine hesitancy on vaccination behavior.

methodsWe conducted an online questionnaire from February 9 to April 9, 2021, in China. The target population was Chinese residents aged 18 and over. A total of 14,236 responses were received. Structural equation modeling was used to test the extended PMT model hypotheses.

resultsA total of 10,379 participants were finally included in this study, of whom 52.0% showed hesitancy toward vaccination. 2854 (27.5%) participants reported that they got flu shots in the past year, and 2561 (24.7%) participants were vaccinated against COVID-19. 2857 (27.5%) participants engaged in healthcare occupation. The model explained 85.7% variance of vaccine hesitancy. Self-efficacy was the strongest predictor, negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy (

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the extended PMT model is efficient in explaining vaccine hesitancy. However, the predictive ability of vaccine hesitancy on vaccination behavior is limited.

Indexed as

COVID-19MotivationAdolescentAdultChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccinesadultsbehaviorprotection motivation theoryVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35103578
PMCPMC8993063
OpenAlexW4210778838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.