Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103265›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2022

C-H⋯S hydrogen bonding interactions.

Hazel A Fargher, Tobias J Sherbow, Michael M Haley, Darren W Johnson, Michael D Pluth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disarming carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stereo-reversed E2 unlocksScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nonenzymatic RNA copying with a potentially primordial genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazel A FargherDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1253, USA. haley@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-9557
Tobias J SherbowDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1253, USA. haley@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2205-1370
Michael M HaleyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1253, USA. haley@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-4141
Darren W JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1253, USA. haley@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5115
Michael D PluthDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1253, USA. haley@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-653X

Funding

Design of Modular Receptors for Ion and Molecule RecognitionR01GM087398 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI HALEY, MICHAEL MARK, JOHNSON, DARREN WILLIAM · 2010 to 2020
$2.6M
Incorporation of Zinc and Nickel Complexes that Bind H2S and HS in ChemFET Sensing DevicesF32GM139372 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SHERBOW, TOBIAS J · 2021 to 2021
$66k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM139372NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short C-H⋯S contacts found in available structural data for both small molecules and larger biomolecular systems suggest that such contacts are an often overlooked yet important stabilizing interaction. Moreover, many of these short C-H⋯S contacts meet the definition of a hydrogen bonding interaction. Using available structural data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), as well as selected examples from the literature in which important C-H⋯S contacts may have been overlooked, we highlight the generality of C-H⋯S hydrogen bonding as an important stabilizing interaction. To uncover and establish the generality of these interactions, we compare C-H⋯S contacts with other traditional hydrogen bond donors and acceptors as well as investigate how coordination number and metal bonding affect the preferred geometry of interactions in the solid state. This work establishes that the C-H⋯S bond meets the definition of a hydrogen bond and serves as a guide to identify C-H⋯S hydrogen bonds in diverse systems.

Indexed as

Hydrogen Bonding

Identifiers

PMID35103265
PMCPMC9088610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.