Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103253›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast imaging

Recent Trends in Screening Breast MRI.

Michelle V Lee, Shani Aharon, Kevin Kim, Katerina Sunn Konstantinoff, Catherine M Appleton, Dustin Stwalley, Margaret A Olsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle V LeeMedical College of Georgia, Department of Radiology, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-893X
Shani AharonMedical School at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA.
Kevin KimWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Katerina Sunn KonstantinoffWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Catherine M AppletonSSM Health, Department of Radiology, Bridgeton, MO, USA.
Dustin StwalleyWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Margaret A OlsenWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USAugusta University · USSSM Health Care · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS ADMINISTRATIVE DATA REPOSITORYR24HS019455 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2010 to 2010
$969k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS019455NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess trends in screening breast MRI utilization among privately insured women in the U.S. from 2007 to 2017.

methodsThe utilization of screening breast MRI among women aged 25-64 years from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, was obtained using the MarketScan Commercial Database. We used Current Procedural Terminology codes to exclude breast MRI exams performed in women with a new breast cancer diagnosis and in women imaged to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy in the preceding 90 days. During the 11-year study, 351 763 study-eligible women underwent 488 852 MRI scans.

resultsAn overall 55.0% increase in screening breast MRI utilization was observed over the study period, with a steadily increasing trend. The greatest annual increase in percent utilization was from 2007 to 2008 at 16.6%. The highest utilization rate was in 2017, in which 0.4% of women aged 25-64 years underwent screening breast MRI. Of the women who underwent screening MRI with sufficient follow-up, 76.5% underwent only one examination during the study period.

conclusionUtilization of screening breast MRI has increased steadily in the past decade to a peak of 0.4% of adult women. However, an estimated 9% of U.S. women are eligible for high-risk breast MRI screening; thus, utilization falls short of optimal compliance. Further studies to evaluate the barriers to screening compliance may help optimize utilization.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningbreast MRIhigh risk

Identifiers

PMID35103253
PMCPMC8794012
OpenAlexW4200312971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.