Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103198›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Efficacy and Safety of Andexanet Alfa for Bleeding Caused by Factor Xa Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dhan B Shrestha, Pravash Budhathoki, Ayush Adhikari, Sudat Shrestha, Nirajan Khati, Wasey Ali Yadullahi Mir, Tilak Joshi, Anuj Shrestha

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Use of Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in US Verified Trauma Centers: A National Survey.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhan B ShresthaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, USA.
Pravash BudhathokiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, USA.
Ayush AdhikariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, NPL.
Sudat ShresthaDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, NPL.
Nirajan KhatiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Bishnudevi Hospita, Kirtipur, NPL.
Wasey Ali Yadullahi MirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Tilak JoshiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, USA.
Anuj ShresthaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Mount Sinai Hospital · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USPatan Academy of Health Sciences · NPTribhuvan University · NPUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) including factor Xa inhibitors are associated with bleeding events which can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Reversal agents like andexanet alfa (AA) and 4F-PCC (Four-factor prothrombin concentrate complex) are available for treating bleeding that occurs with DOAC therapy but a comparison on their efficacy is lacking. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of patients treated with andexanet alfa for bleeding events from DOAC. Databases were searched for relevant studies where AA was used to determine efficacy and safety in bleeding patients who were on factor Xa inhibitors. Published papers were screened independently by two authors. RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) was used for data synthesis. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) was used to estimate the outcome with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Among 1245 studies were identified after a thorough database search and three studies were included for analysis. AA resulted in lower odds of mortality compared to 4F- PCC (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71) among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. There was no difference in thrombotic events between patients receiving AA and 4F-PCC (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.36-15.84). No differences in length of hospital stay and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were seen between patients receiving AA and 4F-PCC. In conclusion, andexanet alfa reduced in-hospital mortality in patients who had bleeding due to factor Xa inhibitors compared to 4F-PCC. However, there were no differences in thrombotic events, length of ICU, and hospital stay between patients treated with AA and 4F-PCC.

Indexed as

andexanet alfableeding reversalcerebral hemorrhagefactor xa inhibitorsmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35103198
PMCPMC8783383
OpenAlexW4200086668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.