Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35103112›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of blood research2021

An analysis of hematological, coagulation and biochemical markers in COVID-19 disease and their association with clinical severity and mortality: an Indian outlook.

Mukta Pujani, Sujata Raychaudhuri, Mitasha Singh, Harnam Kaur, Shivani Agarwal, Manjula Jain, R K Chandoke, Kanika Singh, Dipti Sidam, Varsha Chauhan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mukta PujaniDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Sujata RaychaudhuriDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Mitasha SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Harnam KaurESIC Medical College & Hospital Alwar, India.
Shivani AgarwalDepartment of Physiology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Manjula JainDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
R K ChandokeDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Kanika SinghDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Dipti SidamDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Varsha ChauhanDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital Faridabad, Haryana, India.
ESIC Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe "cytokine storm" (CS) in COVID-19 leads to the worst stage of illness which can be controlled only with timely intervention. There is an urgent need to identify laboratory markers of disease progression for optimum allocation of resources in developing countries like India.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 COVID-19 positive patients over two months. The cases were sub-classified based on disease severity into mild to moderate (n=61), severe (n=26) and very severe (n=13) and into survivors (n=85) and non-survivors (n=15) based on survivor status. These patients were tested for hematological parameters (total blood lymphocyte counts, NLR, PLR, platelet indices etc.), coagulation markers (D-dimer, fibrin degradation products (FDP), fibrinogen etc.) and biochemical markers (LDH, ferritin, IL-6, procalcitonin, hs-CRP).

resultsStatistically significant differences were observed in hematological variables (ANC, NLR and ESR), coagulation parameters (D-dimer, FDP, fibrinogen and thrombin time) and biochemical markers (LDH, ferritin, IL-6, procalcitonin and hs-CRP) with regard to subcategories based of disease severity as well as survivor status. There was strong correlation between NLR, D-dimer, IL-6, procalcitonin and ferritin. IL-6 emerged as the single best marker of disease severity (AUC: 0.997, P=0.00), however procalcitonin, LDH, D-dimer, FDP and NLR could also predict severe disease with a good sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionTo conclude, study demonstrates a plethora of biomarkers which could be utilized to accurately identify the hyperinflammation and tissue damage reminiscent of cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients so that timely, safe, and effective therapies can be administered to prevent progression and potentially reduce mortality.

Indexed as

acute phase reactantbiochemical markercoagulationCOVID-19D-dimerhematological indicesIL-6NLR

Identifiers

PMID35103112
PMCPMC8784646
OpenAlexW4210821307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.