ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Journalists' Response and Reporting of Public Emergencies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI applications in disaster governance with health approach: A scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Pooled it
- Retracted: Journalists' Response and Reporting of Public Emergencies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-16Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/D6DBC356C1EC06C5F2419159E50F8B
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to improve the response ability of journalists to public emergencies, this study uses the computer simulation research method, based on Shannon's information theory and the basic theory of journalism and communication, constructs the general model of public emergencies based on the statistical results of big data, and constructs the irrational natural person game model of four types of news communication participants. In the simulation analysis, it is found that in the face of public emergencies, journalists, on the one hand, firmly implement the publicity caliber, strengthen the amount of creation, and improve the forwarding amount and approval amount of manuscripts under the artificial intelligence news system. On the other hand, they should achieve effective interaction with nonofficial news media such as we media, and the subjective news department should provide effective guidance and guidance to the media.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.