Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102881›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2022

Atomic model validation using the CCP-EM software suite.

Agnel Praveen Joseph, Mateusz Olek, Sony Malhotra, Peijun Zhang, Kevin Cowtan, Tom Burnley, Martyn D Winn

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Protein model refinement for cryo-EM maps using AlphaFold2 and the DAQ score.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agnel Praveen JosephScientific Computing Department, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Mateusz OlekDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Sony MalhotraScientific Computing Department, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Peijun ZhangElectron BioImaging Center, Diamond Light Source, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Kevin CowtanDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-1437
Tom BurnleyScientific Computing Department, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-348X
Martyn D WinnScientific Computing Department, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0496-6796

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T012935/1Medical Research Council MR/N009614/1Medical Research Council MR/N009614/1, MR/V000403/1Medical Research Council MR/V000403/1Medical Research Council MR/V000403/1)Wellcome Trust 206422/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 208398/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been a dramatic improvement in the quality and quantity of data derived using cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). This is also associated with a large increase in the number of atomic models built. Although the best resolutions that are achievable are improving, often the local resolution is variable, and a significant majority of data are still resolved at resolutions worse than 3 Å. Model building and refinement is often challenging at these resolutions, and hence atomic model validation becomes even more crucial to identify less reliable regions of the model. Here, a graphical user interface for atomic model validation, implemented in the CCP-EM software suite, is presented. It is aimed to develop this into a platform where users can access multiple complementary validation metrics that work across a range of resolutions and obtain a summary of evaluations. Based on the validation estimates from atomic models associated with cryo-EM structures from SARS-CoV-2, it was observed that models typically favor adopting the most common conformations over fitting the observations when compared with the model agreement with data. At low resolutions, the stereochemical quality may be favored over data fit, but care should be taken to ensure that the model agrees with the data in terms of resolvable features. It is demonstrated that further re-refinement can lead to improvement of the agreement with data without the loss of geometric quality. This also highlights the need for improved resolution-dependent weight optimization in model refinement and an effective test for overfitting that would help to guide the refinement process.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopySoftwareImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, MolecularReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer InterfaceCCP-EMcryo-EMmodel geometrymodel validationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35102881
PMCPMC8805302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.