Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102537›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2022

Pharmacotherapy for Sexual Dysfunction in Women.

Jeong Hoo Lee, Jenny E Lee, Veronica Harsh, Anita H Clayton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sleep-Related Eating Disorder and Sexsomnia; Two Rare Parasomnias? A Mini-Review with Illustrative Case-Reports.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeong Hoo LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jenny E LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Veronica HarshDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Anita H ClaytonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. ahc8v@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review article discusses the controversy in the DSM-5 conceptualization and diagnostic criteria for female sexual dysfunction (FSD). An overview of recent studies on available treatments for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), and genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPD) is provided. RECENT

findingsInclude delineation of the process of care for pre- and postmenopausal women with HSDD; release of global position statement on testosterone therapy in women; updates on efficacy and safety of vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause and bremelanotide for HSDD; removal of flibanserin alcohol REMS; and development of new technology to enhance bioavailability and brain delivery of treatments. The DSM-5 revision combining HSDD and FSAD into one diagnostic category is a less accurate characterization of these separate disorders and may hinder access to demonstrated effective treatments for the women with these conditions. There are a wide range of pharmacological, other physiological, and psychological treatment options available for women with FSD, which can be offered based on their specific symptoms, potential benefits/risks, and preferences.

Indexed as

Sexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansLibidoTestosteroneTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID35102537
OpenAlexW4210311791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.