ReviewIrish journal of medical science2023
Literature review and proposal of best practice for ophthalmologists: monitoring of patients following intravitreal brolucizumab therapy.
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Two-Year, Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter, Three-Arm Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of RTH258 Versus Aflibercept in Subjects With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Two-year, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Two-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of RTH258 6 mg Versus Aflibercept in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- TALON phase IIIb study: 64 week results of brolucizumab versus aflibercept using treat-and-extend for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Rates of Drug-Induced Uveitis: A Review by Medication Class.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Ophthalmic Use of Targeted Biologics in the Management of Intraocular Diseases: Current and Emerging Therapies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Inflammation and Vasculitis Related to Brolucizumab.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Trends in the Cumulative Post-Marketing Reporting Rates of Retinal Vasculitis and/or Retinal Vascular Occlusion and Associated Vision Loss with Brolucizumab.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- The Treatment Patterns with Brolucizumab in Germany (REALIZE) Study: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Longitudinal Prescription Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brolucizumab is a novel humanised, single-chain, variable fragment inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A for the treatment of neurovascular age-related macular degeneration. Brolucizumab gained US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval following the Phase III HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328) trials which compared brolucizumab with aflibercept, presenting a tolerable safety and favourable efficacy profile. The mean change (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error) in best-corrected visual acuity letters from baseline to week 96 in the HAWK trial was 5.9 ± 0.78 for brolucizumab (6 mg) versus 5.3 ± 0.78 for aflibercept, and in the HARRIER trial, 6.1 ± 0.73 (6 mg) for brolucizumab (6 mg) and 6.6 ± 0.73 for aflibercept. Within both trials, greater reductions were noted in the central subfield thickness from baseline to week 96 in the brolucizumab (6 mg) groups versus the aflibercept group. Subsequent post-marketing reports detailed intraocular inflammation (IOI) after brolucizumab treatment and in response an independent safety review committee conducted a post hoc data review. While comparable, the rate of brolucizumab-associated IOI was higher in the post hoc analysis than the trials (4.6% and 4.4%, respectively). Findings from trials and real-world data indicate there may be pre-defining risk factors that predispose patients to IOI following brolucizumab treatment. With a thorough understanding of IOI classification and best practice management, ophthalmologists can use brolucizumab confidently and, should a case arise, they should act quickly to prevent vision loss. Herein, we provide information and guidance to support clinical decision-making related to brolucizumab use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.