Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102497›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2023

Literature review and proposal of best practice for ophthalmologists: monitoring of patients following intravitreal brolucizumab therapy.

Dara J Kilmartin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02307682 phase3completednot on this map

A Two-Year, Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter, Three-Arm Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of RTH258 Versus Aflibercept in Subjects With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlcon ResearchRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,775ConditionsNeovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal NeovascularizationArmsBrolucizumab ophthalmic solution, Aflibercept ophthalmic solution
NCT02434328 phase3completednot on this map

A Two-year, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Two-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of RTH258 6 mg Versus Aflibercept in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlcon ResearchRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1,048ConditionsNeovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal NeovascularizationArmsBrolucizumab ophthalmic solution, Aflibercept ophthalmic solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Rates of Drug-Induced Uveitis: A Review by Medication Class.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Inflammation and Vasculitis Related to Brolucizumab.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dara J KilmartinRoyal Victoria Eye & Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin, Ireland. djkilmartin@me.com.
Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brolucizumab is a novel humanised, single-chain, variable fragment inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A for the treatment of neurovascular age-related macular degeneration. Brolucizumab gained US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval following the Phase III HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328) trials which compared brolucizumab with aflibercept, presenting a tolerable safety and favourable efficacy profile. The mean change (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error) in best-corrected visual acuity letters from baseline to week 96 in the HAWK trial was 5.9 ± 0.78 for brolucizumab (6 mg) versus 5.3 ± 0.78 for aflibercept, and in the HARRIER trial, 6.1 ± 0.73 (6 mg) for brolucizumab (6 mg) and 6.6 ± 0.73 for aflibercept. Within both trials, greater reductions were noted in the central subfield thickness from baseline to week 96 in the brolucizumab (6 mg) groups versus the aflibercept group. Subsequent post-marketing reports detailed intraocular inflammation (IOI) after brolucizumab treatment and in response an independent safety review committee conducted a post hoc data review. While comparable, the rate of brolucizumab-associated IOI was higher in the post hoc analysis than the trials (4.6% and 4.4%, respectively). Findings from trials and real-world data indicate there may be pre-defining risk factors that predispose patients to IOI following brolucizumab treatment. With a thorough understanding of IOI classification and best practice management, ophthalmologists can use brolucizumab confidently and, should a case arise, they should act quickly to prevent vision loss. Herein, we provide information and guidance to support clinical decision-making related to brolucizumab use.

Indexed as

OphthalmologistsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbrolucizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFBrolucizumabIntraocular inflammationRetinal occlusionRetinal vasculitisSafety findings

Identifiers

PMID35102497
PMCPMC9892069
OpenAlexW4210493798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.