Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102495›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 survivors and caregivers: a case study-centred narrative review.

Michelle E Kho, Oleksa G Rewa, J Gordon Boyd, Karen Choong, Graeme C H Stewart, Margaret S Herridge

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle E KhoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. khome@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-031X
Oleksa G RewaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
J Gordon BoydCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Karen ChoongDepartment of Pediatrics and the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Graeme C H StewartFaculty of Public Affairs, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Margaret S HerridgeInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carleton University · CAImpact · CAMcMaster University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCritical illness is a transformative experience for both patients and their family members. For COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), survival may be the start of a long road to recovery. Our knowledge of the post-ICU long-term sequelae of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) may inform our understanding and management of the long-term effects of COVID-19. SOURCE: We identified international and Canadian epidemiologic data on ICU admissions for COVID-19, COVID-19 pathophysiology, emerging ICU practice patterns, early reports of long-term outcomes, and federal support programs for survivors and their families. Centred around an illustrating case study, we applied relevant literature from ARDS and SARS to contextualize knowledge within emerging COVID-19 research and extrapolate findings to future long-term outcomes. PRINCIPAL

findingsCOVID-19 is a multisystem disease with unknown long-term morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is distinct and unique from ARDS, SARS, and critical illness. Nevertheless, based on initial reports of critical care management for COVID-19 and the varied injurious supportive practices employed in the ICU, patients and families are at risk for post-intensive care syndrome. The distinct incremental risk of COVID-19 multiple organ dysfunction is unknown. The risk of mood disorders in family members may be further exacerbated by imposed isolation and stigma.

conclusionEmerging literature on COVID-19 outcomes suggests some similarities with those of ARDS/SARS and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The pathophysiology of COVID-19 is presented here in the context of early outcome data and to inform an agenda for longitudinal research for patients and families.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeCanadaCaregiversCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Survivorsacute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19mechanical ventilationoutcomepost-intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35102495
PMCPMC8802985
OpenAlexW4210666791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.