ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
An unbiased algorithm for objective separation of Alzheimer's, Alzheimer's mixed with cerebrovascular symptomology, and healthy controls from one another using electrovestibulography (EVestG).
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface Versus Penetrative rTMS Stimulation May Be More Effective for AD Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease.Neuroscience insights · 2025Article
- Gray and White Matter Voxel-Based Morphometry of Alzheimer's Disease With and Without Significant Cerebrovascular Pathologies.Neuroscience insights · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Diagnostic Value of Electrovestibulography (EVestG) in Alzheimer's Patients with Mixed Pathology: A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) from AD with cerebrovascular disease pathology (AD-CVD) is a rising challenge. Using electrovestibulography (EVestG) measured signals, we develop an automated feature extraction and selection algorithm for an unbiased identification of AD and AD-CVD from healthy controls as well as their separation from each other. EVestG signals of 24 healthy controls, 16 individuals with AD, and 13 with AD-CVD were analyzed within two separate groupings: One-versus-One and One-versus-All. A multistage feature selection process was conducted over the training dataset using linear support vector machine (SVM) classification with 10-fold cross-validation, k nearest neighbors/averaging imputation, and exhaustive search. The most frequently selected features that achieved highest classification performance were selected. 10-fold cross-validation was applied via a linear SVM classification on the entire dataset. Multivariate analysis was run to test the between population differences while controlling for the covariates. Classification accuracies of ≥ 80% and 78% were achieved for the One-versus-All classification approach and AD versus AD-CVD separation, respectively. The results also held true after controlling for the effect of covariates. AD/AD-CVD participants showed smaller/larger EVestG averaged field potential signals compared to healthy controls and AD-CVD/AD participants. These characteristics are in line with our previous study results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35102489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.