ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022
Cardiac Effects of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: Mechanisms and Clinical Management.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer in Japan: final analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Trial
- Heart transplantation in pediatric oncology patients.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Current Perspectives on Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas: Focus on BRAF and MEK Inhibition.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Care in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Updates on Risk, Prevention, and Therapies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- MEK inhibitors: a promising targeted therapy for cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiotoxicity of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors According to HFA/ICOS Cardiotoxicity Risk Category.JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe identification of BRAF mutation prompted the development of new class of targeted therapy for treating melanoma: BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors. Cardiovascular events have been reported with these treatments and could counterbalance their long-term maintenance. RECENT
findingsLVEF decrease due to BRAF and MEK inhibitors appears fairly common (10%) but usually not severe, without impact on patient outcomes. To date, no treatment options have been tested to prevent or to treat a decrease of LVEF associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. QTc prolongation was observed in 3% and arterial hypertension in 20% during treatment but only one-third of cases required a therapeutic change. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have revolutionized the management and the prognosis of melanoma patients. Cardio-oncology units may be useful for a better care of potential cardiac toxicity and particularly to inappropriately avoid discontinuing BRAF and MEK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.