Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102476›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Surgical complications of endoscopic approach to skull base: analysis of 584 consecutive patients.

Mohammad Taghvaei, Sara Fallah, Shokufeh Sadaghiani, Seyed Mousa Sadrhosseini, Azin Tabari, Mohammadreza Fathi, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tips and Tricks to Safely Perform an Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-Sphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Surgeon's Checklist.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad TaghvaeiBrain and Spinal Injury Research Center (BASIR), Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd, P. O. Box 1419733141, Tehran, Iran.
Sara FallahBrain and Spinal Injury Research Center (BASIR), Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd, P. O. Box 1419733141, Tehran, Iran.
Shokufeh SadaghianiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mousa SadrhosseiniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azin TabariDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza FathiBrain and Spinal Injury Research Center (BASIR), Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd, P. O. Box 1419733141, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi ZeinalizadehBrain and Spinal Injury Research Center (BASIR), Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd, P. O. Box 1419733141, Tehran, Iran. mzeinalizadeh@tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9757-1560
Imam Khomeini Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopic techniques have been widely applied for challenging cranial base surgeries in recent years. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of using the endoscopic endo-nasal route for various skull base pathologies in terms of postoperative complications.

methodsA total of 584 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic skull base surgery were studied. Peri- and post-operative complications and risk factors affecting the occurrence of these complications were evaluated.

results648 endoscopic skull base surgical procedures were performed on 584 patients (47.8% females and 52.2% males) with the mean age of 41.2 years. Pituitary adenoma (69.3%) was the most common pathology. Post-operative mortality was 2.0%. The rates of post-operative permanent neurological deficit (one case of 6th nerve injury, two 12th nerve injuries and one hemiparesis) and visual deterioration were 0.6% and 1.5%, respectively. Ten patients (1.7%) were complicated with meningitis and it was the cause of death in 3. Systemic complications not directly attributable to skull base surgical access occurred in 2% (11 patients) with 5 mortalities. The rate of intra-operative vascular injury was 1% and among them one patient died due to PCA injury. The most common post-operative complications were diabetes insipidus (12.5%), anterior pituitary dysfunction (10.6%) and CSF leak (3.6%), respectively. In general, reoperation, malignant lesions, and level IV of surgical complexity were associated with a higher incidence of complications.

conclusionEndoscopic endo-nasal approach can be a safe and less-morbid first-line treatment of patients with various skull base lesions.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsSkull Base NeoplasmsAdultCerebrospinal Fluid LeakEndoscopyFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSkull BaseComplicationEndo-nasal surgeryEndoscopic surgerySkull base surgery

Identifiers

PMID35102476
OpenAlexW4210800485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.