Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102464›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2022

Validation of the PAM-13 instrument in the Hungarian general population 40 years old and above.

Zsombor Zrubka, Péter Vékás, Péter Németh, Ágota Dobos, Ottó Hajdu, Levente Kovács, László Gulácsi, Judith Hibbard, Márta Péntek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A latent profile analysis of patient activation in postoperative breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Population norms for the EQ-5D-5L for Hungary: comparison of online surveys and computer assisted personal interviews.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zsombor ZrubkaUniversity Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Bécsi út 96/b, Budapest, 1034, Hungary. zrubka.zsombor@uni-obuda.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-6087
Péter VékásInstitute of Mathematical Statistics and Modelling, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-814X
Péter NémethDoctoral School of Economics, Business and Informatics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-1848
Ágota DobosCentre for Foreign Language Education and Research, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-9422
Ottó HajduInstitute of Business Economics, Eötvös Loránd University, Rákóczi út 7, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-5813
Levente KovácsUniversity Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Bécsi út 96/b, Budapest, 1034, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3188-0800
László GulácsiUniversity Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Bécsi út 96/b, Budapest, 1034, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-8746
Judith HibbardHealth Policy Research Group, University of Oregon, 1209 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403-1209, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8376-8343
Márta PéntekUniversity Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Bécsi út 96/b, Budapest, 1034, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-6012
Obuda University · HUCorvinus University of Budapest · HUEötvös Loránd University · HUUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 679681Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap 2019-1.3.1-KK-2019-00007Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap FK-132343Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap TKP2020-NKA-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient activation comprises the skills, knowledge and motivation necessary for patients' effective contribution to their care. We adapted and validated the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) in the ≥ 40 years old Hungarian general population.

methodsA cross-sectional web survey was conducted among 900 respondents selected from an online panel via quota sampling. After 10 days, the survey was repeated on 100 respondents. The distribution, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor structure, convergent, discriminant and known-groups validity of PAM-13 were assessed according to the COSMIN guidelines.

resultsThe sample comprised 779 respondents. Mean (± SD) age was 60.4 ± 10.6 years, 54% were female and 67% had chronic illness. Mean (± SD) PAM-13 score was 60.6 ± 10.0. We found good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha: 0.77), moderate test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.62; n = 75), a single-factor structure and good content validity: PAM-13 showed moderate correlation with the eHealth Literacy Scale (r = 0.40), and no correlation with age (r = 0.02), education (r = 0.04) or income (ρ = 0.04). Higher PAM-13 scores were associated with fewer lifestyle risks (p < 0.001), more frequent health information seeking (p < 0.001), participation in patient education (p = 0.018) and various online health-related behaviours. When controlling for health literacy, sociodemographic factors and health status, the association of higher PAM-13 scores with overall fewer lifestyle risks, normal body mass index, physical activity and adequate diet remained significant. Similar properties were observed in the subgroup of participants with chronic morbidity, but not in the age group 65+.

conclusionPAM-13 demonstrated good validity in the general population. Its properties in clinical populations and the elderly as well as responsiveness to interventions warrant further research.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyTelemedicineAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnaireseHEALSHealth literacyI10Lifestyle-related risksOnline surveyPAM-13Patient activationPsychometric validation

Identifiers

PMID35102464
PMCPMC9550701
OpenAlexW4212976544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.