Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102442›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control.

Giulia Mattavelli, Sara Lo Presti, Diana Tornaghi, Nicola Canessa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07432841 (Innovative Neuromodulation Treatments for Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07432841 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Neuromodulation Treatments for Chronic Pain: Assessing and Predicting the Effects of Personalized High-Definition Protocols for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2025 to 2027Enrolled144ConditionsChronic PainArmsAnodal High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Cathodal High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Sham (No Treatment)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia MattavelliIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Sara Lo PrestiIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Diana TornaghiIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Nicola CanessaIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100, Pavia, Italy. nicola.canessa@iusspavia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-6384
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging evidence highlights the translational implications of targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), i.e. a key node of the networks underlying conflict monitoring and decision-making, in brain stimulation treatments with clinical or rehabilitative purposes. While the optimized modelling of "high-definition" current flows between multiple anode-cathode pairs might, in principle, allow to stimulate an otherwise challenging target, sensitive benchmark metrics of dACC neuromodulation are required to assess the effectiveness of this approach. On this basis, we aimed to assess the modulatory effect of anodal and cathodal high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) of the dACC on different facets of executive control and decision-making in healthy young individuals. A combined modelling/targeting procedure provided the optimal montage for the maximum intensity of dACC stimulation with six small "high-definition" electrodes delivering anodal, cathodal or sham HD-tDCS for 20 min in a within-subject design with three separate sessions. Following stimulation, participants performed Flanker and gambling tasks unveiling individual differences in executive control and both loss- and risk-aversion in decision-making, respectively. Compared to both anodal and sham conditions, cathodal dACC stimulation significantly affected task performance by increasing control over the Flanker conflict effect, and both loss and risk-aversion in decision-making. By confirming the feasibility and effectiveness of dACC stimulation with HD-tDCS, these findings highlight the implications of modelling and targeting procedures for neuromodulation in clinical research, whereby innovative protocols might serve as treatment addressing dysfunctional dACC activity, or combined with cognitive training, to enhance higher-order executive functioning in different neuropsychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

GamblingTranscranial Direct Current StimulationElectrodesExecutive FunctionGyrus CinguliHumansPrefrontal CortexDecision-makingDorsal anterior cingulate cortexExecutive controlHigh-definition tDCSLoss/Risk aversionTreatment

Identifiers

PMID35102442
OpenAlexW4210785744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.