Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102440›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of implant dentistry2022

A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials.

Önder Solakoğlu, Duygu Ofluoğlu, Heidi Schwarzenbach, Guido Heydecke, Daniel Reißmann, Sertan Ergun, Werner Götz

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of implant dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pericardium decellularization in a one-day, two-step protocol.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Önder SolakoğluCenter for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. o.solakoglu@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-3457
Duygu OfluoğluDepartment of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Heidi SchwarzenbachInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido HeydeckeDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel ReißmannDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sertan ErgunDepartment of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Werner GötzLaboratory for Oral Biologic Basic Science, Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEIstanbul University · TRUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to longitudinally evaluate changes in alveolar bone crest (ABC) levels and differences in resorption rates (RR) between the tested grafting materials following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction after 1, 2, and 3 years (T1-T8) of clinical function.

methodsPatients were randomly assigned to two different bone allografts (group 1 maxgraft

resultsChanges in (ABC-M), (ABC-D), (ABC-BL), (ABC-B), and (ABC-O) levels showed statistically highly significant differences between T1 and T2 for both bone allografts (p < 0.001). Changes at the ABC-M and ABC-BL levels between T2 and T3 of group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Both groups achieved and maintained increased ABC levels without statistically significant differences throughout the monitoring periods of 1-3 years (T6-T8) of clinical function. No failures or adverse events were observed.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this study is within its limitations the first study to directly compare ABC-changes and differences in RR of two different allogeneic grafting materials for a period of 3 years after ARP. It was demonstrated to be, despite significant differences in RR, a successful method of preserving increased ABC levels through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function. Trial registration DRKS00013010, registered 07/30/2018, http://apps.who.int/trialsearch.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossAlveolar Ridge AugmentationDental ImplantsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAlveolar ProcessHumansProspective StudiesTooth SocketDental ImplantsAllogeneic bone graftAlveolar ridge preservationExtraction socketImplantsPericardium membranePRGF

Identifiers

PMID35102440
PMCPMC8804085
OpenAlexW4210400553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.