Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102349›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Why many funding schemes harm rather than support research.

Martin Dresler, Eva Buddeberg, Ulrike Endesfelder, Jan Haaker, Christian Hof, Robert Kretschmer, Dirk Pflüger, Fabian Schmidt

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rethink funding by putting the lottery first.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin DreslerDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany. martin.dresler@donders.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-3818
Eva BuddebergDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-5274
Ulrike EndesfelderDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-6278
Jan HaakerDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8366-9559
Christian HofDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7763-1885
Robert KretschmerDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-3748
Dirk PflügerDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-0212
Fabian SchmidtDie Junge Akademie, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.