Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102348›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Asymmetric reinforcement learning facilitates human inference of transitive relations.

Simon Ciranka, Juan Linde-Domingo, Ivan Padezhki, Clara Wicharz, Charley M Wu, Bernhard Spitzer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Humans forage for reward in reinforcement learning tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A mathematical theory of relational generalization in transitive inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon Ciranka *Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-9781
Juan Linde-Domingo *Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-7453
Ivan PadezhkiCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Clara WicharzCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Charley M WuCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2215-572X
Bernhard SpitzerCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. spitzer@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9752-932X
Max Planck Institute for Human Development · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other animals are capable of inferring never-experienced relations (for example, A > C) from other relational observations (for example, A > B and B > C). The processes behind such transitive inference are subject to intense research. Here we demonstrate a new aspect of relational learning, building on previous evidence that transitive inference can be accomplished through simple reinforcement learning mechanisms. We show in simulations that inference of novel relations benefits from an asymmetric learning policy, where observers update only their belief about the winner (or loser) in a pair. Across four experiments (n = 145), we find substantial empirical support for such asymmetries in inferential learning. The learning policy favoured by our simulations and experiments gives rise to a compression of values that is routinely observed in psychophysics and behavioural economics. In other words, a seemingly biased learning strategy that yields well-known cognitive distortions can be beneficial for transitive inferential judgements.

Indexed as

LearningReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsHumansJudgment

Identifiers

PMID35102348
PMCPMC9038534
OpenAlexW4210266128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.