Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102337›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2022

Clinical decisions using AI must consider patient values.

Jonathan Birch, Kathleen A Creel, Abhinav K Jha, Anya Plutynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Moral diversity and the challenge of responsibility in AI-CDSS.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Deployment and Governance.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Need to Be Explainable-or Do They?Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan BirchCentre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. j.birch2@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-4759
Kathleen A CreelMcCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society and the Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abhinav K JhaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Anya PlutynskiDepartment of Philosophy and Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-7720

Funding

A no-gold-standard framework to objectively evaluate quantitative imaging methods with patient dataR01EB031051 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JHA, ABHINAV K · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
A fully automated PET radiomics frameworkR56EB028287 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JHA, ABHINAV K · 2021 to 2021
$493k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031051NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB028287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID35102337
PMCPMC9825143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.