Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102280›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2022

The role of ROS in tumour development and progression.

Eric C Cheung, Karen H Vousden

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 712 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
712citing papers in PubMed
129.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

712 citing papers in PubMed, 1,445 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Imaging xCT with Immuno-PET in Therapy-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Emerging Role of Ferroptosis in Pediatric Cancer Biology and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

652 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric C CheungThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Karen H VousdenThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. karen.vousden@crick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7365-1766
The Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C596/A26855Cancer Research UK FC001029Cancer Research UK FC001557Medical Research Council FC001029Medical Research Council FC001557Wellcome Trust FC001029Wellcome Trust FC001557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells have developed complex systems to regulate the production and response to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Different ROS control diverse aspects of cell behaviour from signalling to death, and deregulation of ROS production and ROS limitation pathways are common features of cancer cells. ROS also function to modulate the tumour environment, affecting the various stromal cells that provide metabolic support, a blood supply and immune responses to the tumour. Although it is clear that ROS play important roles during tumorigenesis, it has been difficult to reliably predict the effect of ROS modulating therapies. We now understand that the responses to ROS are highly complex and dependent on multiple factors, including the types, levels, localization and persistence of ROS, as well as the origin, environment and stage of the tumours themselves. This increasing understanding of the complexity of ROS in malignancies will be key to unlocking the potential of ROS-targeting therapies for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID35102280
OpenAlexW4210498051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.