Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102098›Full record

ArticleMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2022

Toward a better measure of midlife sexual function: pooled analyses in nearly 1,000 women participating in MsFLASH randomized trials.

Susan D Reed, Janet S Carpenter, Joseph Larson, Caroline M Mitchell, Jan Shifren, Julia Heiman, Nancy Fugate Woods, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Andrea Z LaCroix, Katherine A Guthrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sexual dysfunction outcomes and reporting disparities after multimodal treatment for rectal cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susan D ReedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Janet S CarpenterIndiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN.
Joseph LarsonPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Caroline M MitchellMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jan ShifrenMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Julia HeimanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN.
Nancy Fugate WoodsSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Stacy Tessler LindauDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine-Geriatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; and.
Andrea Z LaCroixDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Katherine A GuthriePublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

Funding

INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
Menopausal Symptoms Initiative-Finding Lasting Answers for Sweats and Hot FlashesU01AG032699 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2008 to 2012
$13.5M
MsFLASH: Living a Healthy MenopauseR01AG048209 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2015 to 2019
$7.2M
MSI-FLASH: Relative Efficacy of Hormonal and Non-Hormonal Interventions for VMSU01AG032700 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COHEN, LEE S, JOFFE, HADINE · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
MSI FLASH: An RCT of Yoga and Ultra Low-Dose Estrogen Gel for Vasomotor SymptomsU01AG032682 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI NEWTON, KATHERINE M. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Efficacy of an SSRI for Menopausal Symptoms in Perimenopausal WomenU01AG032656 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FREEMAN, ELLEN W · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: Paced Respiration for Breast Cancer SurvivorsU01AG032659 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CARPENTER, JANET S · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: An Exercise Intervention for Women with Menopausal SymptomsU01AG032669 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CAAN, BETTE J · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048209NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032656NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032659NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032669NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032682NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032699NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate appropriateness of the current Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)-19 value of <26.6 to designate female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in postmenopausal women, using the Female Sexual Distress-Revised (FSDS-R) scale to measure distress.

methodsParticipant-level data containing standardized measures from five completed Menopause Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers for Symptoms and Health trials was pooled. Baseline characteristics and FSFI-19 scores were compared across trials (F-test, homogeneity). FSFI-19 score associations with the FSDS-R were described. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to illustrate the choice of optimal FSFI-19 value to predict sexual distress. ROC curves were also estimated adjusting for trial number, clinical center, age, education, race, smoking, and BMI.

resultsNine hundred ninety eight women (79.2% postmenopausal), mean age 55.9 (SD 4.8) had complete FSFI-19, FSDS-R, and covariate data. Baseline mean FSFI-19 score among all participants and sexually active participants was 18.7 (SD 9.5) and 22.0 (SD 7.2), respectively. There was a consistent pattern across the trials of inverse association between poorer sexual function (FSFI-19) and greater sexual distress. Based on the ROC curve showing the likelihood of FSDS-R frequent or greater distress according to cut points of FSFI, the optimal cut point for FSD was FSFI-19 <21 for all participants. This cut point corresponded to sensitivity 87.2% (95% CI, 83.4-91.0), specificity 57.9% (95% CI, 54.3-61.6) and adjusted area under the ROC curve 78.8% (95% CI, 75.8-81.8).

conclusionsA new FSFI-19 cut point of ≥21 should be considered to describe normal sexual function in periand postmenopausal women as opposed to the standard cut point of >26.6. VIDEO SUMMARY: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A915.

Indexed as

Sexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSexual BehaviorSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35102098
PMCPMC8976731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.