Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101973›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions.

Sebastian Dunnett, Robert A Holland, Gail Taylor, Felix Eigenbrod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Direct solar energy conversion on zinc-air battery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Renewable energy infrastructure impacts biodiversity beyond the area it occupies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Reply to Niebuhr et al.: Infrastructure impacts must always be assessed locally.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Reply to Pérez-García et al.: Perfect is the enemy of good.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian DunnettGeography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom; sebdunnett@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-2508
Robert A HollandGeography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3038-9227
Gail TaylorBiological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-6390
Felix EigenbrodGeography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-824X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected areas and renewable energy generation are critical tools to combat biodiversity loss and climate change, respectively. Over the coming decades, expansion of the protected area network to meet conservation objectives will be occurring alongside rapid deployment of renewable energy infrastructure to meet climate targets, driving potential conflict for a finite land resource. Renewable energy infrastructure can have negative effects on wildlife, and co-occurrence may mean emissions targets are met at the expense of conservation objectives. Here, we assess current and projected overlaps of wind and solar photovoltaic installations and important conservation areas across nine global regions using spatially explicit wind and solar data and methods for predicting future renewable expansion. We show similar levels of co-occurrence as previous studies but demonstrate that once area is accounted for, previous concerns about overlaps in the Northern Hemisphere may be largely unfounded, although they are high in some biodiverse countries (e.g., Brazil). Future projections of overlap between the two land uses presented here are generally dependent on priority threshold and region and suggest the risk of future conflict can be low. We use the best available data on protected area degradation to corroborate this level of risk. Together, our findings indicate that while conflicts between renewables and protected areas inevitably do occur, renewables represent an important option for decarbonization of the energy sector that would not significantly affect area-based conservation targets if deployed with appropriate policy and regulatory controls.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesSolar EnergyBrazilbiodiversityconservationenergyrenewable

Identifiers

PMID35101973
PMCPMC8832964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.