Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101969›Full record

Trial reportPostgraduate medical journal2022

In situ simulation training for a better interprofessional team performance in transferring critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective randomised control trial.

Sidharta Kusuma Manggala, Aida Rosita Tantri, Adhrie Sugiarto, Imelda Rosalyn Sianipar, Theddeus Octavianus Hari Prasetyono

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Postgraduate medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A scoping review of global approaches to education in adult critical care retrieval.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sidharta Kusuma ManggalaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-5864
Aida Rosita TantriDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia aidatantri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-985X
Adhrie SugiartoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2542-1373
Imelda Rosalyn SianiparSIMUBEAR (Simulation Based Medical Education and Research Center), IMERI (Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-096X
Theddeus Octavianus Hari PrasetyonoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Departement of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-4309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransferring critically ill patients with COVID-19 is a challenging task; therefore, well-trained medical team is needed. This study aimed to determine the role of in situ simulation training during pandemic by using high-fidelity manikin to improve interprofessional communication, skills and teamwork in transferring critically ill patients with COVID-19.

methodsThis single-blinded randomised control trial included 40 subjects allocated into standard low-fidelity simulator (LFS) and high-fidelity simulator (HFS) groups. Subjects, who were not members of multiprofessional team taking care of patients with COVID-19, in each group were assigned into small groups and joined an online interactive lecture session, two sessions of in-situ simulation and a debriefing session with strict health protocols. The first simulation aimed to teach participants the skills and steps needed. The second simulation aimed to assess transfer skills, communication and teamwork performance, that participants had learnt using a validated, comprehensive assessment tool. Data were analysed using unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test.

resultsThe HFS group showed significantly better overall transfer and communication skills than LFS group (89.70±4.65 vs 77.19±3.6, <0.05 and 100 vs 88.34 (63.33-100), p=0.022, respectively). The HFS group also demonstrated significantly better teamwork performance than the standard LFS group (90 (80-900) vs 80 (70-90), p=0.028).

conclusionIn situ simulation training using HFS significantly showed better performance than the standard training using LFS in regards to overall transfer and communication skills as well as teamwork performance. The training using HFS may provide a valuable adjunct to improve interprofessional skills, communication and teamwork performance in transferring critically ill patients with COVID-19.Trial registration numberNCT05113823.

Indexed as

COVID-19Simulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCritical IllnessHumansInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamProspective Studiesadult intensive & critical caremedical education & training

Identifiers

PMID35101969
PMCPMC8814429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.