Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101893›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2022

Boosting of the SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Response after Vaccination with Single-Dose Sputnik Light Vaccine.

Alexey A Komissarov, Inna V Dolzhikova, Grigory A Efimov, Denis Y Logunov, Olga Mityaeva, Ivan A Molodtsov, Nelli B Naigovzina, Iuliia O Peshkova, Dmitry V Shcheblyakov, Pavel Volchkov and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04898140 (The Evaluation of the Intensity of Cellular and Humoral Immunity to COVID-19 Causative Agent in Moscow Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04898140 completednot on this map

The Evaluation of the Intensity of Cellular and Humoral Immunity to COVID-19 Causative Agent in Moscow Residents

TypeobservationalSponsorMoscow Department of HealthRan2020 to 2021Enrolled5,340ConditionsCovid19, Respiratory Viral InfectionArmsSARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG detection, ELISpot: detection of the T cells specific to different SARS-CoV-2 proteins, Flow cytometry: detection of the SARS-CoV-2 specific T-helpers and cytotoxic T lymphocytes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 Vaccinating Russian Medical Students-Challenges and Solutions: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexey A KomissarovClinical City Hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky, Moscow Department of Healthcare, Moscow, Russia; komissarovlexa@yandex.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-5195
Inna V DolzhikovaFederal State Budget Institution National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2548-6142
Grigory A EfimovNational Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-6062
Denis Y LogunovFederal State Budget Institution National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Olga MityaevaGenome Engineering Laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-1601
Ivan A MolodtsovClinical City Hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky, Moscow Department of Healthcare, Moscow, Russia.
Nelli B NaigovzinaA.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia; and.
Iuliia O PeshkovaNational Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-3380
Dmitry V ShcheblyakovFederal State Budget Institution National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Pavel VolchkovGenome Engineering Laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9794-6297
Alexander L GintsburgFederal State Budget Institution National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Elena VasilievaClinical City Hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky, Moscow Department of Healthcare, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite measures taken world-wide, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues. Because efficient antiviral drugs are not yet widely available, vaccination is the best option to control the infection rate. Although this option is obvious in the case of COVID-19-naive individuals, it is still unclear when individuals who have recovered from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection should be vaccinated and whether the vaccination raises immune responses against the coronavirus and its novel variants. In this study, we collected peripheral blood from 84 healthy human donors of different COVID-19 status who were vaccinated with the Sputnik Light vaccine and measured the dynamics of the Ab and T cell responses, as well as the virus-neutralizing activity (VNA) in serum, against two SARS-CoV-2 variants, B.1.1.1 and B.1.617.2. We showed that vaccination of individuals previously exposed to the virus considerably boosts the existing immune response. In these individuals, receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG titers and VNA in serum were already elevated on the 7th day after vaccination, whereas COVID-19-naive individuals developed the Ab response and VNA mainly 21 d postvaccination. Additionally, we found a strong correlation between RBD-specific IgG titers and VNA in serum, and according to these data vaccination may be recommended when the RBD-specific IgG titers drop to 142.7 binding Ab units/ml or below. In summary, the results of the study demonstrate that vaccination is beneficial for both COVID-19-naive and recovered individuals, especially since it raises serum VNA against the B.1.617.2 variant, one of the five SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedProtein DomainsRussiaSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesGam-COVID-Vac vaccineImmunoglobulin GVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID35101893
PMCPMC9012078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.