Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101336›Full record

GuidelineGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2022

Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC).

Peter Horak, Malachi Griffith, Arpad M Danos, Beth A Pitel, Subha Madhavan, Xuelu Liu, Cynthia Chow, Heather Williams, Leigh Carmody, Lisa Barrow-Laing and 37 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 170 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward consistency in somatic genomic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Multiplatform curation in the development of ACMG/AMP specifications for Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Peter HorakNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.horak@nct-heidelberg.de.
Malachi GriffithWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Arpad M DanosWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Beth A PitelMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Subha MadhavanGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Xuelu LiuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Cynthia ChowBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Heather WilliamsColumbia University, New York, NY.
Leigh CarmodyThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Lisa Barrow-LaingQIAGEN Inc, Redwood City, CA.
Damian RiekeCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Simon KreutzfeldtNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
David TamboreroKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Manuela BenaryCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Padma Sheila RajagopalCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Cristiane M IdaMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Harry LesmanaGenomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Laveniya SatgunaseelanRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jason D MerkerUNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Michael Y TolstorukovDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Paulo Vidal CampregherHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jeremy L WarnerVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Shruti RaoGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Maya NatesanWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Haolin ShenWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Jeffrey VenstromFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA.
Somak RoyCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Kayoko TaoNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Rashmi Kanagal-ShamannaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Xinjie XuMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Deborah I RitterBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Kym PagelJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Kilannin KrysiakWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Adrian DubucBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Yassmine M AkkariLegacy Health, Portland, OR.
Xuan Shirley LiCongenica Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jennifer LeeFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Ian KingUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gordana RacaUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Alex H WagnerNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Marylin M LiChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Sharon E PlonBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Shashikant KulkarniBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Obi L GriffithWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Debyani ChakravartyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: chakravd@mskcc.org.
Dmitriy SonkinNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. Electronic address: dmitriy.sonkin@nih.gov.

Funding

Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Risk Factors, Early Detection and Personalized InterventionUL1TR001409 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GONDRE-LEWIS, MARJORIE C, MELLMAN, THOMAS A · 2015 to 2024
$37.8M
The Clinical Genome Resource – Advancing genomic medicine through biocuration and expert assessment of genes and variants at scaleU24HG009650 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONATHAN S BERG, Jessica Ezzell Hunter · 2021 to 2026
$30.0M
The Future of PharmGKB Funding Under NHGRIU41HG009649 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL · 2017 to 2020
$13.4M
Standardized and Genome-Wide Clinical Interpretation of Complex Genotypes for Cancer Precision MedicineU24CA237719 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Tools for Normalizing and Interpreting the Clinical Actionability of Genomic VariantsR00HG010157 · NHGRI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI WAGNER, ALEX HANDLER · 2021 to 2023
$727k
Germline-Somatic Interactions and Association with Treatment Response in CancerZIABC012112 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RAJAGOPAL, PADMA · 2022 to 2025
$513k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001409NCI NIH HHS U24 CA237719NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG010157NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG009650NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG009649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral professional societies have published guidelines for the clinical interpretation of somatic variants, which specifically address diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Although these guidelines for the clinical interpretation of variants include data types that may be used to determine the oncogenicity of a variant (eg, population frequency, functional, and in silico data or somatic frequency), they do not provide a direct, systematic, and comprehensive set of standards and rules to classify the oncogenicity of a somatic variant. This insufficient guidance leads to inconsistent classification of rare somatic variants in cancer, generates variability in their clinical interpretation, and, importantly, affects patient care. Therefore, it is essential to address this unmet need.

methodsClinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Somatic Cancer Clinical Domain Working Group and ClinGen Germline/Somatic Variant Subcommittee, the Cancer Genomics Consortium, and the Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium used a consensus approach to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the classification of oncogenicity of somatic variants.

resultsThis comprehensive SOP has been developed to improve consistency in somatic variant classification and has been validated on 94 somatic variants in 10 common cancer-related genes.

conclusionThe comprehensive SOP is now available for classification of oncogenicity of somatic variants.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanNeoplasmsGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansVirulenceCancer genetic testingOncogenicityPathogenicitySomatic variantVariant classification

Identifiers

PMID35101336
PMCPMC9081216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.