Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101121›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2022

Structure-based knowledge acquisition from electronic lab notebooks for research data provenance documentation.

Max Schröder, Susanne Staehlke, Paul Groth, J Barbara Nebe, Sascha Spors, Frank Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Max SchröderInstitute of Communications Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. max.schroeder@uni-rostock.de.
Susanne StaehlkeDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Paul GrothInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Barbara NebeDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Sascha SporsInstitute of Communications Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Frank KrügerInstitute of Communications Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7925-3363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) are used to document experiments and investigations in the wet-lab. Protocols in ELNs contain a detailed description of the conducted steps including the necessary information to understand the procedure and the raised research data as well as to reproduce the research investigation. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether such ELN protocols can be used to create semantic documentation of the provenance of research data by the use of ontologies and linked data methodologies.

methodsBased on an ELN protocol of a biomedical wet-lab experiment, a retrospective provenance model of the raised research data describing the details of the experiment in a machine-interpretable way is manually engineered. Furthermore, an automated approach for knowledge acquisition from ELN protocols is derived from these results. This structure-based approach exploits the structure in the experiment's description such as headings, tables, and links, to translate the ELN protocol into a semantic knowledge representation. To satisfy the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reuseable (FAIR) guiding principles, a ready-to-publish bundle is created that contains the research data together with their semantic documentation.

resultsWhile the manual modelling efforts serve as proof of concept by employing one protocol, the automated structure-based approach demonstrates the potential generalisation with seven ELN protocols. For each of those protocols, a ready-to-publish bundle is created and, by employing the SPARQL query language, it is illustrated that questions about the processes and the obtained research data can be answered.

conclusionsThe semantic documentation of research data obtained from the ELN protocols allows for the representation of the retrospective provenance of research data in a machine-interpretable way. Research Object Crate (RO-Crate) bundles including these models enable researchers to easily share the research data including the corresponding documentation, but also to search and relate the experiment to each other.

Indexed as

DocumentationKnowledge BasesElectronicsRetrospective StudiesSemantic WebElectronic laboratory notebooksFAIRKnowledge acquisitionProvenanceResearch dataRO-CrateSemantic documentation

Identifiers

PMID35101121
PMCPMC8802522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.