Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101117›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2022

Utility and reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in patients scheduled for major vascular surgery: a prospective, observational, multicentre observer-blinded study.

Reema Ayyash, Joanne Knight, Elke Kothmann, Mohamed Eid, Katie Ayyash, Kerry Colling, David Yates, Aileen Mill, Gerard Danjoux

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03403673 (Clinical Frailty Scale Validation in Patients Scheduled for Vascular Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03403673 unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Frailty Scale Validation in Patients Scheduled for Vascular Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsVascular DiseasesArmsFrailty assessment tools
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frail to Fail: More Support for Less Reserve-Can Clinical Frailty Scale Predict Path to Liberation?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interrater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in the anesthesia preadmission clinic.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reema AyyashSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Joanne KnightGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK. joanne.knight5@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8668-1825
Elke KothmannThe University Hospital of North Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Mohamed EidSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Katie AyyashYork & Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Kerry CollingSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
David YatesYork & Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Aileen MillVertebrate Biodiversity and Ecology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Gerard DanjouxSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.

Funding

Vascular Anaesthesia Society of Great Britain and Ireland 8123SA VASGBI Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is a distinctive health state associated with a loss of physiological reserve that results in higher rates of perioperative complications and impaired return to pre-morbid functional status. It is prevalent in the vascular population; however routine assessment is not common despite national guidance to the contrary. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in assessing frailty in the surgical vascular population.

methodsIn this prospective, observational, observer-blinded study, we compared assessment of frailty in patients scheduled for major vascular surgery attending the pre-operative assessment clinic using the Clinical Frailty Scale against the Edmonton Frailty Scale. The study investigator completed the Edmonton Frailty Scale assessment; this was compared to the Clinical Frailty Scale assessments performed by the pre-assessment consultant and pre-assessment nurse, who were blinded to the Edmonton Frailty Scale score. The inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale between the pre-assessment consultant and pre-assessment nurse was determined by comparing their frailty scores for each patient.

resultsNinety-seven patients were included in the analysis (median age 72 years, 84% male and 16% female). There was a moderate level of agreement between the Edmonton and Clinical Frailty Scale score for both consultants (87.6% agreement) and pre-assessment nurses (87.6% agreement). There was a substantial level of agreement between consultants and pre-assessment nurses for the Clinical Frailty Scale (89.7% agreement)

conclusionsThe Clinical Frailty Scale is a useful tool to assess frailty in the vascular surgical population. It is more practical than the Edmonton Frailty Scale: quick to complete, requires minimal training and can be used when physical disability is present.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the Wales Health and Care Research Ethics Service (REC reference 17/WA/0160, IRAS 201173).

trial registrationNCT03403673. Registered 19 January 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03403673.

Indexed as

Clinical Frailty ScaleEdmonton Frailty ScaleFrailtypre-operative carereproducibility of resultsvascular surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID35101117
PMCPMC8802497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.