Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101115›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2022

Rationale, design and methods of VA-BRAVE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of two formulations of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder in veterans.

Ismene Petrakis, Sandra A Springer, Cynthia Davis, Elizabeth Ralevski, Lucy Gu, Robert Lew, John Hermos, Melynn Nuite, Adam J Gordon, Thomas R Kosten and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04375033 (CSP #2014 - Comparative Effectiveness of Two Formulations of Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04375033 phase4recruitingnot on this map

CSP #2014 - Comparative Effectiveness of Two Formulations of Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans (VA-BRAVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2029Enrolled952ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderArmsSublingual buprenorphine with naloxone, Injectable subcutaneous buprenorphine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ismene Petrakis *Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA. Ismene.Petrakis@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6894-5946
Sandra A Springer *Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Cynthia DavisUS Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC), Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth RalevskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lucy GuDepartment of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Robert LewCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA, USA.
John HermosSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Melynn Nuite
Adam J GordonInformatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Thomas R KostenDepartment of Psychiatry, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Edward V NunesDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Robert RosenheckDepartment of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Andrew J SaxonCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert SwiftProvidence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Alexa GoldbergUS Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Robert RingerUS Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ryan FergusonUS Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC), Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the US opioid epidemic, there is an urgent clinical need to provide persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) with effective medication treatments for OUD (MOUD). Formulations of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BUP/NLX) are considered the standard of care for OUD including within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). However, poor retention on MOUD undermines its effectiveness. Long-acting injectable monthly buprenorphine (INJ-BUP) (e.g., Sublocade®) has the potential to improve retention and therefore reduce opioid use and overdose. Designing and conducting studies for OUD pose unique challenges. The strategies and solutions to some of these considerations in designing Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) 2014, Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans (VA-BRAVE), a randomized, 20-site, clinical effectiveness trial comparing INJ-BUP to SL-BUP/NLX conducted within the VHA may provide valuable guidance for others confronted with similar investigation challenges.

methodsThis 52-week, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two current FDA-approved formulations of buprenorphine: (1) daily SL-BUP/NLX vs. (2) monthly (28-day) INJ-BUP for Veterans with moderate to severe OUD (n = 952). The primary outcomes are (1) retention in MOUD and (2) opioid abstinence. Secondary outcomes include measures of other drug use, psychiatric symptoms, medical outcomes including prevalence rates of HIV, hepatitis B and C as well as social outcomes (housing instability, criminal justice involvement), service utilization and cost-effectiveness. Special considerations in conducting a comparative effectiveness trial with this population and during COVID-19 pandemic were also included. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the extended-release formulation of buprenorphine compared to the standard sublingual formulation in real-world VHA settings is of paramount importance in addressing the opioid epidemic. The extent to which this new treatment facilitates retention, decreases opioid use, and prevents severe sequelae of OUD has not been studied in any long-term trial to date. Positive findings in this trial could lead to widespread adoption of MOUD, and, if proven superior INJ-BUP, by clinicians throughout the VHA and beyond. This treatment has the potential to reduce opioid use among Veterans, improve medical, psychological, and social outcomes, and save lives at justifiable cost. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04375033.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCOVID-19Opioid-Related DisordersVeteransHumansNarcotic AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2BuprenorphineNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineComparative effectiveness trialInjectableOpioid use disorderVeterans

Identifiers

PMID35101115
PMCPMC8802273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.