Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35101044›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Increased use of knowledge translation strategies is associated with greater research impact on public health policy and practice: an analysis of trials of nutrition, physical activity, sexual health, tobacco, alcohol and substance use interventions.

Luke Wolfenden, Kaitlin Mooney, Sharleen Gonzalez, Alix Hall, Rebecca Hodder, Nicole Nathan, Serene Yoong, Elizabeth Ditton, Rachel Sutherland, Christophe Lecathelinais and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Supporting Decision Making in Early Years Initiatives: Co-Designing a Child Health Evidence Dashboard.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. So what? Elevating the impact of implementation science.Implementation science communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia. Luke.Wolfenden@health.nsw.gov.au.
Kaitlin MooneySchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Sharleen GonzalezSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Rebecca HodderSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Nicole NathanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Serene YoongSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Elizabeth DittonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Sam McCrabbSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1128348National Heart Foundation of Australia 101175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGreater use of knowledge translation (KT) strategies is recommended to improve the research impact of public health trials. The purpose of this study was to describe (1) the research impact of setting-based public health intervention trials on public health policy and practice; (2) the association between characteristics of trials and their research impact on public health policy and practice; and (3) the association between the use of KT strategies and research impacts on public health policy and practice.

methodsWe conducted a survey of authors of intervention trials targeting nutrition, physical activity, sexual health, tobacco, alcohol or substance use. We assessed the use of KT strategies aligned to domains of the Knowledge-To-Action Framework. We defined "research impact" on health policy and practice as any one or more of the following: citation in policy documents or announcements, government reports, training materials, guidelines, textbooks or court rulings; or endorsement by a (non)governmental organization; use in policy or practice decision-making; or use in the development of a commercial resource or service.

resultsOf the included trials, the authors reported that 65% had one or more research impacts. The most frequently reported research impact was citation in a policy document or announcement (46%). There were no significant associations between the effectiveness of the intervention, trial risk of bias, setting or health risk and trial impact. However, for every one unit increase in the total KT score (range 0-8), reflecting greater total KT activity, the odds of a health policy or practice research impact increased by approximately 30% (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.66; p = 0.031). Post hoc examination of KT domain scores suggests that KT actions focused on providing tailored support to facilitate program implementation and greater use of research products and tools to disseminate findings to end-users may be most influential in achieving impact.

conclusionsTrials of public health interventions frequently have public health impacts, and the use of more comprehensive KT strategies may facilitate greater research impact.

Indexed as

Sexual HealthSubstance-Related DisordersExerciseHealth PolicyHumansTobacco ProductsTranslational Science, BiomedicalImplementation scienceKnowledge translationPolicyPractice research impactPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35101044
PMCPMC8805264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.