Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100998›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Disparities in sexual and reproductive health services utilization among urban and rural adolescents in southern Ethiopia, 2020: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Aklilu Habte, Samuel Dessu, Biruk Bogale, Lire Lemma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aklilu HabteSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia. akliluhabte57@gmail.com.
Samuel DessuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Biruk BogaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman, Southern Ethiopia, Ethiopia.
Lire LemmaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough studies on the uptake of Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) services in Ethiopia have been conducted they have failed to show the disparity in service uptake among rural and urban settings. Once the extent and determinants of ASRH service uptake in urban and rural contexts are known, it will be crucial to provide evidence-based information and recommendations for potential interventions to reduce the burden of disease and disability among adolescents. This study aimed at determining the level of SRH service utilization among urban and rural adolescents in the Guraghe zone, Southern Ethiopia.

methodsA community-based comparative cross-sectional study was undertaken from November 1 -30, 2020. A multi-stage sampling technique was employed and a total of 1083 adolescents (361 from the urban and 722 from the rural areas) were selected randomly to take part in the study. Pre-tested, interviewer-administered, structured questionnaires were used to collect the data. The data were encoded and entered into Epi-Data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. χ2 test was computed to see a significant difference in SRH service utilization among urban and rural adolescents. In a bivariable logistic regression analysis, a variable with a p-value less than 0.25 has been selected for a multivariable logistic regression model. Variables with p-values less than 0.05 were declared statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression.

resultsA total of 1,075 adolescents (358 from urban and 717 from rural) took part in the study, yielding a response rate of 99.3%. The overall SRH service utilization among the whole adolescents was 39.5% (95%CI: 36.5, 42.4). There was a significant difference in SRH service utilization between urban 56.9% (95%CI: 51.8, 62.1) and rural 30.8% (95%CI: 27.4, 34.2) adolescents (χ2 = 68.3, p < 0.001). Residence[AOR = 2.62; 95%CI:1.63,3.41], availability of youth clubs [AOR = 4.73; 95%CI:3.43,6.53], taking part in peer education [AOR = 2.06; 95%CI:1.48,3.88], having parental discussion [AOR = 3.29; 95%CI:1.73,3.33], and being knowledgeable on SRH issues [AOR = 2.01; 95%CI: 1.45,3.03] were identified as a significant determinants of SRH service uptake. Having parental discussion, geographical accessibility, and knowledge on SRH were significant predictors of SRH service uptake among rural adolescents.

conclusionOverall, ASRH service utilization in the study area was low, despite urban adolescent service uptake becoming higher than rural adolescents. Since the majority of adolescents were enrolled in schools, schools should be an area of intervention to improve adolescents' knowledge of SRH services through mass media, community networks, and interpersonal/group communication. Furthermore, promoting parent-adolescent discussions, as well as peer-to-peer discussions at the family and school level, should be emphasized. Stakeholders in the education and health sectors need to strengthen their efforts to establish youth clubs in places where they do not yet exist, especially in rural schools.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareReproductive Health

Identifiers

PMID35100998
PMCPMC8802483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.