Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100987›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Ceftazidime and cefepime antagonize 5-fluorouracil's effect in colon cancer cells.

Christina Pfab, Anush Abgaryan, Barbara Danzer, Fatme Mourtada, Weaam Ali, André Gessner, Nahed El-Najjar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina Pfab *Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Anush Abgaryan *Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Barbara DanzerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Fatme MourtadaInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Weaam AliInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
André GessnerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Nahed El-NajjarInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. Nahed.El-Najjar@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-8586
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-drug interaction (DDI), which can occur at the pharmacokinetics and/or the pharmacodynamics (PD) levels, can increase or decrease the therapeutic or adverse response of a drug itself or a combination of drugs. Cancer patients often receive, along their antineoplastic agents, antibiotics such as ß-lactams to treat or prevent infection. Despite the narrow therapeutic indices of antibiotics and antineoplastic agents, data about their potential interaction are insufficient. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), widely used against colon cancer, is known for its toxicity and large intra- and inter- individual variability. Therefore, knowledge about its interaction with antibiotics is crucial.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated at the PD levels, against HCT-116 colon cancer cells, DDI between 5-FU and several ß-lactams (ampicillin, benzypenicillin, piperacillin, meropenem, flucloxacillin, ceftazidime (CFT), and cefepime (CFP)), widely used in intensive care units. All drugs were tested at clinically achieved concentrations. MTT assay was used to measure the metabolic activity of the cells. Cell cycle profile and apoptosis induction were monitored, in HCT-116 and DLD-1 cells, using propidium iodide staining and Caspase-3/7 activity assay. The uptake of CFT and CFP by the cells was measured using LC-MS/MS method.

resultsOur data indicate that despite their limited uptake by the cells, CFT and CFP (two cephalosporins) antagonized significantly 5-FU-induced S-phase arrest (DLD-1 cells) and apoptosis induction (HCT-116 cells). Remarkably, while CFP did not affect the proliferation of colon cancer cells, CFT inhibited, at clinically relevant concentrations, the proliferation of DLD-1 cells via apoptosis induction, as evidenced by an increase in caspase 3/7 activation. Unexpectedly, 5-FU also antagonized CFT's induced cell death in DLD-1 cells.

conclusionThis study shows that CFP and CFT have adverse effects on 5-FU's action while CFT is a potent anticancer agent that inhibits DLD-1 cells by inducing apoptotic cell death. Further studies are needed to decipher the mechanism(s) responsible for CFT's effects against colon cancer as well as the observed antagonism between CFT, CFP, and 5-FU with the ultimate aim of translating the findings to the clinical settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCefepimeCeftazidimeCell CycleColonic NeoplasmsDrug AntagonismFluorouracilHCT116 CellsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCefepimeCeftazidimeFluorouracil5-fluorouracilAntagonismAntibioticsAnti-cancer agentsApoptosisCefepimeCeftazidimeColon cancerDrug-drug interactionPharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID35100987
PMCPMC8802503
OpenAlexW4210300678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.