Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100972›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Efficacy of vision therapy for unilateral refractive amblyopia in children aged 7-10 years.

Yi-Ching Hsieh, Wen-Ling Liao, Yi-Yu Tsai, Hui-Ju Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Add-on perceptual learning on refractive amblyopia in children.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Childhood amblyopia: A systematic review of recent management options.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Ching HsiehDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wen-Ling LiaoGraduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yi-Yu TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hui-Ju LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, Taichung, Taiwan. irisluu2396@gmail.com.
China Medical University Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a critical period for visual development, conventionally considered to be the first 6 years of life. Children aged 7 years and older are significantly less responsive to amblyopia treatment. This study investigated the efficacy of binocular vision therapy in amblyopic children aged 7-10 years.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 36 children with unilateral amblyopia who were divided into a case group (receiving vision therapy, optical correction, and part-time patching of the weaker eye) and a control group (receiving optical correction and part-time patching of the weaker eye). Visual acuity (VA) was measured at baseline, at the 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month visits, and 3 months after cessation of treatment.

resultsThere were 19 subjects in the case group and 17 subjects in the control group. Mean VA in the case group improved from 0.39 ± 0.24 logMAR at baseline to 0.10 ± 0.23 logMAR at the endpoint of treatment (p < 0.001, paired t-test). Mean VA in the control group improved from 0.64 ± 0.30 logMAR at baseline to 0.52 ± 0.27 logMAR at the endpoint of treatment (p = 0.015, paired t-test). The improvement was significantly greater in the case group than in the control group (p = 0.006, two-samples independent t-test). All subjects underwent follow-up examinations within 6 to 12 months. There was no regression of VA in the case group 3 months after cessation of vision therapy. The patients in the case group who received visual therapy were with better VA improvement then patients with only optic correction and patching.

conclusionsVision therapy combined with conventional treatment (optical correction and part-time patching) is more effective than conventional treatment alone in children aged 7-10 years with unilateral refractive amblyopia. The treatment results not only in greater vision gain, but also in shorter duration of treatment.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaChildHumansRetrospective StudiesSensory DeprivationVision, BinocularVisual AcuityAmblyopiaPart-time patchingVision therapy

Identifiers

PMID35100972
PMCPMC8805323
OpenAlexW4210675544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.