Observational studyAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021
The diagnostic and prognostic value of mature and total adrenomedullin for sepsis: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis in adult patients according to the criteria of sepsis-3: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Presepsin as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis across neonates, children, and adults: A meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of presepsin and Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin in the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Bio-Adrenomedullin and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 as Novel Sepsis Biomarkers in the Emergency Department and the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInformation about biologically active adrenomedullin (mature AM), a potential new biomarker for sepsis and septic shock, is limited. Here, we investigated the value of mature AM for diagnosis and outcome prediction in sepsis. MATERIAL AND
methodsPatients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively cate-gorised into non-sepsis or sepsis groups, according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. Plasma levels of mature and total (the sum of the levels of intermediate and mature forms) AM were measured, and their usefulness was compared with that of other sepsis biomarkers, such as procalcitonin and presepsin.
resultsOf the 98 patients analysed, 42 were assigned to the non-sepsis and 56 to the sepsis group. Mature and total AM levels on admission were significantly higher in patients with than in those without sepsis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of mature and total AM for diagnosing sepsis were 0.85 and 0.88, whereas those of procalcitonin and presepsin were 0.83 and 0.68, respectively. AUCs of mature and total AM for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis became significant on day 3 after admission. A good correlation between the AM forms was found, indicating that changes in their plasma levels may directly reflect each other.
conclusionsBecause mature and total AM levels increased significantly in patients with sepsis on admission, both forms may be used as reliable and early biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. However, prediction of 28-day mortality in such patients would require several days of ICU stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.