Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100722›Full record

ReviewJCO precision oncology2019

Knowledge-Guided Statistical Learning Methods for Analysis of High-Dimensional -Omics Data in Precision Oncology.

Yize Zhao, Changgee Chang, Qi Long

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Knowledge-guided learning methods for integrative analysis of multi-omics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Graph-guided Bayesian SVM with Adaptive Structured Shrinkage Prior for High-dimensional Data.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yize ZhaoWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Changgee ChangUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Qi LongUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional -omics data such as genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic data offer great promise in advancing precision medicine. In particular, such data have enabled the investigation of complex diseases such as cancer at an unprecedented scale and in multiple dimensions. However, a number of analytical challenges complicate analysis of high-dimensional -omics data. One is the growing recognition that complex diseases such as cancer are multifactorial and may be attributed to harmful changes on multiple -omics levels and on the pathway level. When individual genes in an important pathway have relatively weak signals, it can be challenging to detect them on their own, but the aggregated signal in the pathway can be considerably stronger and hence easier to detect with the same sample size. To address these challenges, there is a growing body of literature on knowledge-guided statistical learning methods for analysis of high-dimensional -omics data that can incorporate biological knowledge such as functional genomics and functional proteomics. These methods have been shown to improve predication and classification accuracy and yield biologically more interpretable results compared with statistical learning methods that do not use biological knowledge. In this review, we survey current knowledge-guided statistical learning methods, including both supervised learning and unsupervised learning, and their applications to precision oncology, and we discuss future research directions.

Identifiers

PMID35100722
PMCPMC9797232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.