Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100659›Full record

ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2022

Impact on public attitudes of a mental health audio tour of the National Gallery in London.

Simon Riches, Natalie Steer, Ruxandra Vasile, Sophie Lyles, Laoise O'Reilly, Martina Guiotto, Tom Hughes, Meagan McKay, Megan Westhead, Rachel M Latham and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Simon RichesKing's College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1427-5561
Natalie SteerSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-4298
Ruxandra VasileSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-3580
Sophie LylesSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.
Laoise O'ReillySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.
Martina GuiottoFaculty of Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Tom HughesFaculty of Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Meagan McKaySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.
Megan WestheadSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent, UK.
Rachel M LathamKing's College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3632-4640
Joanne B NewburyKing's College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4080-4033
Anna MurrayThe National Gallery, London, UK.
Amber GoneniThe National Gallery, London, UK.
Aleksandra OrehovaThe National Gallery, London, UK.
Rachel TempleThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Rose ThompsonThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Fiona HoustonAntenna International, London, UK.
Helen L FisherKing's College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-2126

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe arts have the potential to increase public awareness about mental health and reduce stigma. However, arts-based projects to raise awareness have been small-scale. In this study, a mental health-awareness audio tour of The National Gallery in London was co-produced and narrated by young adults with relevant lived experience. The study investigated the acceptability of the tour to the public and evaluated its impact on public attitudes about mental health.

methodsParticipants were Gallery visitors over four consecutive days. The tour led visitors on 10 stops through the Gallery. Each stop focused on artworks and Gallery spaces, challenged common myths about mental health, and invited visitors to consider their personal views. Participants completed measures of mood and attitudes about mental health pre- and post-tour and provided narrative feedback.

resultsPre-tour, participants (N = 213) reported high levels of happiness, compassion towards people with mental health conditions, comfort talking about mental health, and positive attitudes about mental health. Post-tour, participants (N = 111) reported significant increases in happiness, comfort, and positive attitudes. In feedback, participants (N = 85) reported that strengths of the tour were the music, inclusion of lived experience, art and mental health links, and reported that the tour was informative, innovative, and improved mental health awareness.

conclusionsThe tour increased positive attitudes, despite positive baseline attitudes, indicating the feasibility of arts-based interventions in major venues to reduce stigma. Sampling limitations and participant retention suggest that arts-based projects to raise awareness should target more diverse audiences and consider data collection strategies in large venues.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthAttitudeHumansLondonSocial StigmaYoung Adultappsartexperiential learninglived experiencestigma

Identifiers

PMID35100659
PMCPMC9787917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.