ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2022
The essential differences in microbial and chemical components of musk of different qualities secreted by captive male forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii).
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering the Link Between Gut Bacterial Community Structure of Forest Musk Deer (Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Development of Stereotypic Behaviors and Personality Traits of Captive Male Forest Musk Deer and Relationships with Musk Secretion.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Impacts of Captive Domestication and Geographical Divergence on the Gut Microbiome of Endangered Forest Musk Deer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Histological and histochemical characterization of the musk gland in forest musk deer (European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025Article
- Exploring the growing phase forest musk deer (Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Akkermansia muciniphila isolated from forest musk deer ameliorates diarrhea in mice via modification of gut microbiota.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Elucidating metabolites and biosynthetic pathways during musk maturation: insights from forest musk deer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Effects of neutral detergent fiber levels on apparent nutrient digestibility and intestinal microbiota composition and function in forest musk deer.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Insights into the Gut Microbial Diversity of Wild Siberian Musk Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Correlation Analysis between Muskrat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Exploring the growing forest musk deer (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The essential differences in microbial and chemical components of musk of different qualities secreted by captive male forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii).Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musk is a precious raw material and ingredient in Chinese traditional medicine. The production of unqualified musk has become a puzzling problem in forest musk deer (FMD) breeding. However, what the essential differences between so-called unqualified musk and mature qualified musk have not yet been elucidated. In this study, 12 musk samples were collected and separated into two groups according to their external properties. One group is white or black cream-like secretion with sour or unpleasant odour (MM); the other group is brown or blackish brown solid secretion with pleasant fragrance (DM). Next-generation sequencing and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were used to explore the essential differences between the DM and MM groups in microbial and chemical compositions. The results indicate that the DM group has more heterogenous microbial structure but simpler relationships among microbial communities. LEfSe analysis showed that 14 taxa at the genus level could be used to distinguish the DM and MM groups and Bacillus, Paracoccus, tenoteophomonas, Mycobacterium and Leuconostoc were more abundant in the DM group (P < 0.05). In addition, six compounds were identified to specifically distinguish the DM and MM groups under the OPLS-DA model. PICRUSt analysis revealed that metabolic pathways such as carbohydrate metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, energy metabolism, transport and catabolism were enriched in the DM group. All these findings of differences in microbiota and chemical compositions would provide potential clues for MM quality improvement and new evidence for the scientific establishment of a quality evaluation standard for musk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.